Literature DB >> 12132759

What makes a categorization task difficult?

Leola A Alfonso-Reese1, F Gregory Ashby, David H Brainard.   

Abstract

To understand why some categorization tasks are more difficult than others, we consider five factors that may affect human performance--namely, covariance complexity, optimal accuracy level with and without internal noise, orientation of the optimal categorization rule, and class separability. We argue that covariance complexity, an information-theoretic measure of complexity, is an excellent predictor of task difficulty. We present an experiment that consists of five conditions using a simulated medical decision-making task In the task human observers view hundreds of hypothetical patient profiles and classify each profile into Disease Category A or B. Each profile is a continuous-valued, three-dimensional stimulus consisting of three vertical bars, where each bar height represents the result of a medical test. Across the five conditions, covariance complexity was systematically manipulated. Results indicate that variation in performance is largely a function of covariance complexity and partly a function of internal noise. The remaining three factors do not explain performance results. We present a challenge to categorization theorists to design models that account for human performance as predicted by covariance complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12132759     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Procedural learning in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; Shawn W Ell; Elliott M Waldron
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

2.  Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: insights from machine learning.

Authors:  Frank Jäkel; Bernhard Schölkopf; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

3.  Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià; Grant L McGuire; Amanda Seidl; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07-01

4.  Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Navarro; Ridhi Jani; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  A difficulty predictor for perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Taking pigeons to heart: Birds proficiently diagnose human cardiac disease.

Authors:  Victor M Navarro; Edward A Wasserman; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Procedural memory effects in categorization: evidence for multiple systems or task complexity?

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Dave F Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.