Literature DB >> 12132545

Cancer patients' interpretations of verbal expressions when given information about ending cancer treatment.

Maria J Friedrichsen1, Peter M Strang, Maria E Carlsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients' interpretations of the meaning of words used when given bad news are not well studied in medical settings. The aim of this study was to ascertain what significance verbal expressions had for cancer patients when they were given information about ending active tumour treatment, and what message they felt they received.
METHODS: Tape-recorded semi-structured interviews were performed and analysed using a qualitative phenomenographical approach.
RESULTS: Thirty patients with incurable cancer admitted to hospital-based home care unit in Sweden participated. Three main categories about the significance of words emerged: 1) words could indicate indirect warnings as being forewarnings, evasive or ambiguous; 2) words could also be perceived as emotionally trying, as threats or abandoning; 3) other words were fortifying and strengthened the patient in this situation. The overall message given during the information could be interpreted differently: either focused on treatment, on quality of life, or on threat and death.
CONCLUSION: The understanding of the significance of words to tailor the information to patients helps the physician to use forewarnings and fortifying words and to identify and avoid the use of threatening words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12132545     DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm543oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  10 in total

1.  Dying cancer patients' experiences of powerlessness and helplessness.

Authors:  Lisa Sand; Peter Strang; Anna Milberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Breaking the news in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Steven Kirshblum; Joyce Fichtenbaum
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication.

Authors:  Diane S Morse; Elizabeth A Edwardsen; Howard S Gordon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-22

4.  Evidence of palliative care stigma: The role of negative stereotypes in preventing willingness to use palliative care.

Authors:  Megan Johnson Shen; Joseph D Wellman
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2019-08

5.  How oncology fellows discuss transitions in goals of care: a snapshot of approaches used prior to training.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Kate Michaelsen; Stewart Alexander; Elizabeth Hopley; Kelly Edwards; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Next of kin's experience of powerlessness and helplessness in palliative home care.

Authors:  Anna Milberg; Peter Strang; Maria Jakobsson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Responses to a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative patient-centred interview study.

Authors:  Emma R Kirby; Katherine E Kenny; Alexander F Broom; John L Oliffe; Sophie Lewis; David K Wyld; Patsy M Yates; Rhiannon B Parker; Zarnie Lwin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A synthesis of the literature on breaking bad news or truth telling: potential for research in India.

Authors:  Lawrence Martis; Anne Westhues
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01

9.  Interaction between professionals and cancer survivors in the context of Brazilian and Canadian care.

Authors:  Rafaela Azevedo Abrantes de Oliveira; Márcia Maria Fontão Zago; Sally Elizabeth Thorne
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-12-21

Review 10.  An increasing number of qualitative research papers in oncology and palliative care: does it mean a thorough development of the methodology of research?

Authors:  Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Cinzia Brunelli; Micaela Lina
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.