Literature DB >> 12131739

Cervical kyphosis: predictive factors for progression of kyphosis and myelopathy.

Motoki Iwasaki1, Tomio Yamamoto, Akira Miyauchi, Keiichi Amano, Kazuo Yonenobu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of 13 patients with cervical kyphosis. The authors propose new methods of measuring spinal cord compression and predicting the progression of kyphosis.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain predictive factors for progression of cervical kyphosis and myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical kyphosis may be congenital, result from decompression surgery, or occur as a posttraumatic deformity. Although there is the potential for progressive deformity and the development of myelopathy in all these situations, there are few previous reports of predictive factors for progression of cervical kyphosis and myelopathy in patients with cervical kyphosis.
METHODS: The authors studied radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scans of 13 patients with cervical kyphosis, including 9 who had been operated on and had postsurgical secondary kyphosis, and 4 with idiopathic kyphosis without any of the above causes. Compression of the spinal cord at the apex of the cervical kyphosis was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging of the ratio between the anteroposterior diameter of the medulla-pons junction and the spinal cord at the apex.
RESULTS: The mean ratio between the anteroposterior diameter of the medulla-pons junction and the spinal cord at the apex in five patients in whom myelopathy did not develop was 0.37, and was 0.21 in the patients in whom myelopathy developed. Progression of cervical kyphosis was associated with osteophyte formation at the anterior aspect of the vertebral body.
CONCLUSION: A ratio below 0.3 between the anteroposterior diameter of the medulla-pons junction and the spinal cord at the apex was a risk factor for cervical myelopathy. One of the most predictable risk factors of progression of the cervical kyphosis was osteophyte formation at the anterior aspect of the vertebral body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131739     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Correlation between the severity of myelopathy and cervical morphometric parameters on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tomasz Tykocki; Johannes du Plessis; Guy Wynne-Jones
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis.

Authors:  Ke Han; Chang Lu; Jing Li; Guang-Zhong Xiong; Bing Wang; Guo-Hua Lv; You-Wen Deng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Progressive Adolescent Idiopathic Cervical Kyphosis Secondary to Constant Postural Neck Flexion Reading Habit with a 10-year Follow-up: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Lianlei Wang; Yakubu Ibrahim; Yonghao Tian; Suomao Yuan; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Mechanical and cellular processes driving cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Roisin T Dolan; Joseph S Butler; John M O'Byrne; Ashley R Poynton
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

5.  Apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in cervical kyphosis is associated with chronic forward flexed neck: an in vivo rat bipedal walking model.

Authors:  Jinliang Lai; Guanglin Ji; Yuqiao Zhou; Jincai Chen; Min Zhou; Jianwen Mo; Tiansheng Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Changes of cervical sagittal alignments during motions in patients with cervical kyphosis.

Authors:  Lingjie Zhou; Jin Fan; Lin Cheng; Tao Jiang; Bo Yun; Guolong Tang; Jian Yin; Jiahu Fang; Guoyong Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.