Literature DB >> 12131721

Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG.

D Greg Anderson1, Lawrence R Wierzbowski, Daniel M Schwartz, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinically relevant aspects of pedicle screws were subjected to electrical resistance testing.
OBJECTIVES: To catalog commonly used pedicle screws in terms of electrical resistance, and to determine whether polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential to create a high-resistance circuit during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although stimulus-evoked electromyography is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, no studies have documented the electrical resistance of commonly used pedicle screws.
METHODS: Resistance measurements were obtained from eight pedicle screw varieties (5 screws of each type) across the screw shank and between the shank and regions of the screw that would be clinically accessible to stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing with a screw implanted in a pedicle. To determine measurement variability, resistance was measured three times at each site and with the crown of the polyaxial-type screw in three random positions.
RESULTS: Resistance across the screw shank ranged from 0 to 36.4 ohms, whereas resistance across the length of the monoaxial-type screws ranged from 0.1 to 31.8 ohms. Resistance between the hexagonal port and shank of polyaxial-type screws ranged from 0 to 25 ohms. In contrast, resistance between the mobile crown and shank of polyaxial-type screws varied widely, ranging from 0.1 ohms to an open circuit (no electrical conduction). Polyaxial-type screws demonstrated an open circuit in 28 of 75 measurements (37%) and a high-resistance circuit (exceeding 1000 ohms) in 5 of 75 measurements (7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance between the mobile crown and shank, and therefore may fail to demonstrate an electromyographic response during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing in the setting of a pedicle breech. To avoid false-negative stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing, the cathode stimulator probe should be applied to the hexagonal port or directly to the screw shank, and not to the mobile crown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131721     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  A CT-based study investigating the relationship between pedicle screw placement and stimulation threshold of compound muscle action potentials measured by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Gerit Kulik; Etienne Pralong; John McManus; Damien Debatisse; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Xinhua Liao; Xianguang Ma; Changqing Li; Jianda Han; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Development of Neuromonitoring Pedicle Screw - Results of Electrical Resistance and Neurophysiologic Test in Pig Model.

Authors:  Woo-Seok Bang; Jonghoo Park; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Dae-Chul Cho; K Daniel Riew; Du-Hwan Kim; In-Bo Han; Seung-Jae Hyun; Do-Heum Yoon; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.