Literature DB >> 12131543

Progressive hypertrophy regression with sustained pressure reduction in hypertension: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction study.

Richard B Devereux1, Vittorio Palmieri, Jennifer E Liu, Kristian Wachtell, Jonathan N Bella, Kurt Boman, Eva Gerdts, Markku S Nieminen, Vasilios Papademetriou, Björn Dahlöf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the time course of left ventricular (LV) geometric response to blood pressure (BP) control during 2 years of systematic antihypertensive treatment.
DESIGN: A total of 754 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) by Cornell voltage-duration product or Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria on a screening electrocardiogram had their LV mass measured by echocardiogram at enrolment in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) trial, and after 12 and 24 months of blinded therapy with losartan-based or atenolol-based regimens.
SETTING: The LIFE trial, in which hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LVH (Cornell voltage-duration product > 2440 mm x ms and/or Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria SV1 + RV5-6 > 38 mm) were randomized to >or= 4 years double-blinded treatment with losartan or atenolol. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 754 LIFE participants with serial echocardiographic measurements of LV geometry.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LV wall thicknesses, diameter and mass, and its indices.
RESULTS: Mean systolic/diastolic BP fell from 173/95 to 150/84 mmHg after 1 year (P < 0.001) and to 148/83 mmHg at year 2 (P = not significant). Mean echocardiographic LV mass fell from 233 g at baseline to 206 g after 1 year (P < 0.001, adjusted for change in systolic BP) and to 195 g at year 2 (P < 0.001 versus year 1), with a parallel decrease in indexed LV mass [from 56.1 to 49.7 g/m2.7 (P < 0.001), to 47.1 g/m2.7 (P < 0.001 versus year 1)]. Relative wall thickness decreased from 0.41 at baseline to 0.37 at year 1 (P < 0.001), to 0.36 at year 2 (P < 0.001 versus year 1). As a result, there were serial decreases in prevalences of eccentric LVH [44 to 38%, and to 30% (P < 0.001 versus year 1)] and concentric LVH [24 to 7% (P < 0.001), to 2% (P < 0.05 versus year 1)], and increases in the proportion with normal LV geometry [22 to 50% (P < 0.001), and to 64% (P < 0.01 versus year 1)].
CONCLUSIONS: Sustained BP reduction in hypertensive patients with target organ damage causes continued decrease in echocardiographic LV mass and prevalence of anatomic LVH for at least 2 years despite only small BP decreases after the first year of blinded therapy. These data document cardiac benefit of sustained BP control and suggest that maximum LVH regression with effective antihypertensive treatment requires at least 2 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131543     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200207000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  22 in total

Review 1.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy is a key goal of hypertension management.

Authors:  Rubin Zhang; Judy Crump; Efrain Reisin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular mass: prognostic implications.

Authors:  Rajiv S Swamy; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Left Ventricular Geometry on Transthoracic Echocardiogram and Prognosis after Lacunar Stroke: The SPS3 Trial.

Authors:  Thalia S Field; Lesly A Pearce; Richard W Asinger; Nathan G Chan Smyth; Sabe K De; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure.

Authors:  Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  The epidemiology of left ventricular hypertrophy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A Dawson; A D Morris; A D Struthers
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  An updated concept for left ventricular hypertrophy risk in hypertension.

Authors:  Edward D Frohlich
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2009

Review 7.  [Hypertensive heart disease and microangiopathy].

Authors:  M Kelm; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Change in cardiac geometry and function in CKD children during strict BP control: a randomized study.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Matteucci; Marcello Chinali; Gabriele Rinelli; Elke Wühl; Aleksandra Zurowska; Marina Charbit; Giacomo Pongiglione; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: From Pathophysiology to Treatment.

Authors:  Luca Di Lullo; Antonio Gorini; Domenico Russo; Alberto Santoboni; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.041

10.  High-normal blood pressure is associated with new-onset electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  H Ueda; M Miyawaki; H Hiraoka
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.