PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is found in high concentration in prostate tissue and in semen, in which its physiological function appears to be liquefaction. In prostate cancer the peripheral PSA concentration is elevated, which may be used as a disease marker. Systemic and local immune defects have been demonstrated in prostate cancer and we postulated a role for PSA in this immunosuppression. We explored the effects of PSA on human T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PSA was purified from normal seminal plasma using a modified chromatographic technique. The effect of PSA or control protein on lymphocyte responses to mitogens, tetanus toxoid and alloantigens was tested. The inhibitory effect observed was further explored by varying the time of PSA addition, denaturing PSA and including interleukin-2 and anti-PSA antibodies. RESULTS: PSA suppressed in vitro phytohemagglutinin and alloantigen stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in a dose dependent manner. This effect was reversed by adding anti-PSA antibodies but not by interleukin-2. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro PSA effects suggest another T-lymphocyte mediated immunosuppressive mechanism. In vivo high levels of PSA may compromise natural immune responses to cancer and current attempts at immunotherapy for prostate cancer.
PURPOSE:Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is found in high concentration in prostate tissue and in semen, in which its physiological function appears to be liquefaction. In prostate cancer the peripheral PSA concentration is elevated, which may be used as a disease marker. Systemic and local immune defects have been demonstrated in prostate cancer and we postulated a role for PSA in this immunosuppression. We explored the effects of PSA on human T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS:PSA was purified from normal seminal plasma using a modified chromatographic technique. The effect of PSA or control protein on lymphocyte responses to mitogens, tetanus toxoid and alloantigens was tested. The inhibitory effect observed was further explored by varying the time of PSA addition, denaturing PSA and including interleukin-2 and anti-PSA antibodies. RESULTS:PSA suppressed in vitro phytohemagglutinin and alloantigen stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in a dose dependent manner. This effect was reversed by adding anti-PSA antibodies but not by interleukin-2. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro PSA effects suggest another T-lymphocyte mediated immunosuppressive mechanism. In vivo high levels of PSA may compromise natural immune responses to cancer and current attempts at immunotherapy for prostate cancer.
Authors: Jennifer D Wu; Lily M Higgins; Alexander Steinle; David Cosman; Kathy Haugk; Stephen R Plymate Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Harm Westdorp; Annette E Sköld; Berit A Snijer; Sebastian Franik; Sasja F Mulder; Pierre P Major; Ronan Foley; Winald R Gerritsen; I Jolanda M de Vries Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 7.561