Literature DB >> 12131302

Competing risk analysis after radical prostatectomy for clinically nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma according to clinical Gleason score and patient age.

Susan D Sweat1, Erik J Bergstralh, Jeffrey Slezak, Michael L Blute, Horst Zincke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Factors important for determining appropriate therapy for localized prostate cancer are biopsy tumor grade, patient age and co-morbidity. We estimated the probability of dying from prostate cancer or other competing causes stratified by age at diagnosis and clinical histological grade in men diagnosed with clinically nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were treated with radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 751 men comprised a retrospective cohort with clinically nonmetastatic prostate cancer diagnosed and treated with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1971 and 1984. All patients were between 55 and 74 years old (median age 65) at diagnosis and they were followed a median of 14.7 years. The cumulative incidence of prostate cancer death or death from any cause was estimated using methods of competing risk survival analysis.
RESULTS: Overall 435 men died with 32% of the deaths attributable to prostate cancer. In 62%, 27% and 11% of patients the Charlson co-morbidity score was 0, 1 and 2+, respectively. The only significant predictor of death from prostate cancer was clinical Gleason score (p <0.001), while only age and Charlson co-morbidity score were significant independent predictors of death from other causes (p <0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of prostate cancer death after considering competing risks increased with Gleason score regardless of patient age. In men with Gleason scores 2 to 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 to 10 disease the cumulative incidence of prostate cancer death within 20 years was 6% to 7%, 10% to 13%, 15% to 19%, 29% to 35% and 36% to 43%, respectively, depending on age at diagnosis. Clinical stages T2 and T3 outcomes were indistinguishable.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that for any given Gleason score the prostate cancer death rate is similar in older and younger patients with few to no co-morbidities. Men with a score of 7 to 10 were at 29% to 43% risk of death from prostate cancer even when cancer was diagnosed as late as age 74 years and treated surgically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  [The significance of comorbidity and age in radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Selection criteria for the expected management of localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; G Salomon; E Currlin; C Eichelberg; T Schlomm; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  External validation of a nomogram for the prediction of 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sophie Knipper; David Pröwrock; Zhe Tian; Hans Heinzer; Derya Tilki; Pierre Karakiewicz; Markus Graefen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Population-based patterns and predictors of prostate-specific antigen screening among older men in the United States.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Mara A Schonberg; Aria Razmaria; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Sivaraman; G Ordaz Jurado; X Cathelineau; Eric Barret; P Dell'Oglio; S Joniau; M Bianchi; A Briganti; M Spahn; P Bastian; J Chun; P Chlosta; P Gontero; M Graefen; R Jeffrey Karnes; G Marchioro; B Tombal; L Tosco; H Henk van der Poel; R Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Racial differences in survival among men with prostate cancer and comorbidity at time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Vincent L Freeman; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; LaShon C Keys; Marc P Johnson; Kristian Schafernak; Vikas K Patel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Promoting recovery of sexual functioning after radical prostatectomy with group-based stress management: the role of interpersonal sensitivity.

Authors:  Ivan R Molton; Scott D Siegel; Frank J Penedo; Jason R Dahn; David Kinsinger; Lara N Traeger; Charles S Carver; Biing-Jiun Shen; Mahendra Kumar; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Naveen Pokala; Jerry J Trulson; Majdee Islam
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  miR-143 interferes with ERK5 signaling, and abrogates prostate cancer progression in mice.

Authors:  Cyrielle Clapé; Vanessa Fritz; Corinne Henriquet; Florence Apparailly; Pedro Luis Fernandez; François Iborra; Christophe Avancès; Martin Villalba; Stéphane Culine; Lluis Fajas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.