Literature DB >> 12131290

Clinical use of urinary markers for the detection and prognosis of bladder carcinoma: a comparison of immunocytology with monoclonal antibodies against Lewis X and 486p3/12 with the BTA STAT and NMP22 tests.

Martin G Friedrich1, Angelika Hellstern, Stefan H Hautmann, Markus Graefen, Stefan Conrad, Edith Huland, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The noninvasive detection of urothelial carcinoma remains challenging. We prospectively evaluated urine markers for bladder carcinoma. We compared the NMP22 (Matritech, Cambridge, Massachusetts) and BTA Stat (Bard Diagnostics, Redmond, Washington) tests with immunocytology using mAbs 486p3/12 and BG7 against Lewis X antigen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NMP22 and BTA Stat tests were performed in urine samples and immunocytology with mAbs 486p3/12 and BG7 staining were performed in bladder washing specimens in 146 samples of 115 patients undergoing transurethral resection for suspected bladder carcinoma (70) or 45 undergoing followup cystoscopy for a history of bladder carcinoma (76). Bladder carcinoma was detected in 54 patients, including stages pTa in 25, pT1 in 20, pT2 in 8 and carcinoma in situ in 1, while 61 had no evidence of bladder carcinoma. The cutoff was 10 units per ml. for the NMP22, 30% positive cells for 486p3/12 and 5% positive cells for the Lewis X tests.
RESULTS: BTA Stat was positive in 65 samples (44.5%) and NMP22 was positive in 69 (47.3%). Immunocytology with mAbs 486p3/12 and BG7 against Lewis X was positive in 52 (35.6%) and 109 (74.7%) samples, respectively. Sensitivity was 70.3% for BTA Stat, 68.5% for NMP22, 68.5% for 486p3/12 and 94.4% for Lewis X. Specificity was 70.6% for BTA Stat, 65.2% for NMP22, 83.6% for 486p3/12 and 36.9% for Lewis X. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.6804 for NMP22, 0.7226 for Lewis X and 0.8002 for 486p3/12. False-positive results on BTA Stat in 2 of 22 patients (9%), on NMP22 in 2 of 25 (8%), on 486p3/12 in 3 of 11 (27%) and on Lewis X in 4 of 43 (9.3%) were associated with tumor recurrence. Furthermore, negative results on BTA Stat in 2 of 39 patients (2%), on NMP22 in 2 of 36 (0.5%), on Lewis X in 0 of 18 (0%) and on 486p3/12 in 1 of 50 (2%) was associated with tumor recurrence during followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunocytology with mAbs against Lewis X showed higher sensitivity than all commercially available tests evaluated. Because of its high sensitivity and high negative predictive value, it may be useful for screening in a high risk population. Patients with a false-positive 486p3/12 test results are at increased risk for tumor recurrence compared with those with negative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131290     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64660-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of nuclear matrix proteins between gastric cancer and normal gastric tissue.

Authors:  Qin-Xian Zhang; Yi Ding; Zhuo Li; Xiao-Ping Le; Wei Zhang; Ling Sun; Hui-Rong Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Early bladder cancer: concept, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitamura; Taiji Tsukamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Development and characterization of a specific IgG monoclonal antibody toward the Lewis x antigen using splenocytes of Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Authors:  Msano Mandalasi; Nelum Dorabawila; David F Smith; Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro; Richard D Cummings; A Kwame Nyame
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.313

4.  A lectin affinity workflow targeting glycosite-specific, cancer-related carbohydrate structures in trypsin-digested human plasma.

Authors:  Penelope M Drake; Birgit Schilling; Richard K Niles; Miles Braten; Eric Johansen; Haichuan Liu; Michael Lerch; Dylan J Sorensen; Bensheng Li; Simon Allen; Steven C Hall; H Ewa Witkowska; Fred E Regnier; Bradford W Gibson; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 5.  Sweetening the pot: adding glycosylation to the biomarker discovery equation.

Authors:  Penelope M Drake; Wonryeon Cho; Bensheng Li; Akraporn Prakobphol; Eric Johansen; N Leigh Anderson; Fred E Regnier; Bradford W Gibson; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 6.  Glycosylation in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities.

Authors:  Michael A Tainsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04

Review 8.  Defining the role of NMP22 in bladder cancer surveillance.

Authors:  Carvell T Nguyen; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Non-invasive methods of bladder cancer detection.

Authors:  Brian Little
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Comparison of the clinical usefulness of different urinary tests for the initial detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Giovanni Di Lascio; Francesco Del Giudice; Pier Paolo Leoncini; Stefano Salciccia; Alessandro Gentilucci; Angelo Porreca; Benjamin I Chung; Giovanni Di Pierro; Gian Maria Busetto; Ettore De Berardinis; Martina Maggi
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.