OBJECTIVE: Atelectatic alveoli can be recruited or kept open either by sustained inflation maneuvers or by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Little is known about potential interactions between both approaches. Especially, it is not known whether the recruiting effect of sustained inflation maneuvers is maintained in combination with a low PEEP, as suggested recently. In an attempt to answer this question, we combined sustained inflation maneuvers with either high or low PEEP. Both approaches were compared with a strategy likely to result in alveolar atelectasis and with another ensuring adequate alveolar recruitment by adjustment of PEEP alone. DESIGN: Randomized block design. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Isolated perfused rabbit lungs (n = 28). INTERVENTIONS: The lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg. After stabilization, the lungs were randomized to one of four ventilatory strategies, which then were followed for 120 mins: a) PEEP 1 cm H2O (PEEP1, negative control); b) PEEP 1 cm H2O and 30 sec-sustained inflations (20 cm H2O) every 30 mins (SI-1); c) PEEP 3 cm H2O combined with sustained inflations (SI-3); and d) PEEP repeatedly adjusted following a previously established strategy ensuring full alveolar recruitment (DYN, positive control). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Distribution of ventilation and perfusion (Va/Q distribution) was analyzed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Volume-dependent compliance within the tidal volume was determined by using the slice method. Shunt and Va/Q mismatch significantly differed between SI-1 and SI-3, indicating full alveolar recruitment only in the latter. Data of SI-1 did not differ substantially from those of PEEP1, and data obtained in SI-3 were similar to those of DYN. CONCLUSIONS: First, enduring alveolar recruitment by sustained inflation maneuvers is only possible when the alveoli are stabilized thereafter by sufficient PEEP. Second, a ventilation strategy that uses repeated sustained inflations on a comparably high PEEP may not be superior to adequate adjustment of PEEP alone.
OBJECTIVE: Atelectatic alveoli can be recruited or kept open either by sustained inflation maneuvers or by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Little is known about potential interactions between both approaches. Especially, it is not known whether the recruiting effect of sustained inflation maneuvers is maintained in combination with a low PEEP, as suggested recently. In an attempt to answer this question, we combined sustained inflation maneuvers with either high or low PEEP. Both approaches were compared with a strategy likely to result in alveolar atelectasis and with another ensuring adequate alveolar recruitment by adjustment of PEEP alone. DESIGN: Randomized block design. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Isolated perfused rabbit lungs (n = 28). INTERVENTIONS: The lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg. After stabilization, the lungs were randomized to one of four ventilatory strategies, which then were followed for 120 mins: a) PEEP 1 cm H2O (PEEP1, negative control); b) PEEP 1 cm H2O and 30 sec-sustained inflations (20 cm H2O) every 30 mins (SI-1); c) PEEP 3 cm H2O combined with sustained inflations (SI-3); and d) PEEP repeatedly adjusted following a previously established strategy ensuring full alveolar recruitment (DYN, positive control). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Distribution of ventilation and perfusion (Va/Q distribution) was analyzed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Volume-dependent compliance within the tidal volume was determined by using the slice method. Shunt and Va/Q mismatch significantly differed between SI-1 and SI-3, indicating full alveolar recruitment only in the latter. Data of SI-1 did not differ substantially from those of PEEP1, and data obtained in SI-3 were similar to those of DYN. CONCLUSIONS: First, enduring alveolar recruitment by sustained inflation maneuvers is only possible when the alveoli are stabilized thereafter by sufficient PEEP. Second, a ventilation strategy that uses repeated sustained inflations on a comparably high PEEP may not be superior to adequate adjustment of PEEP alone.
Authors: Anna Geke Algera; Luigi Pisani; Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves; Thiago Chaves Amorim; Thomas Cherpanath; Rogier Determann; Dave A Dongelmans; Frederique Paulus; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz; Ary Serpa Neto Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2018-01