Literature DB >> 12130874

Reconstructive surgery for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a viable surgical option with acceptable results.

Anthony R MacLean1, Brenda O'Connor, Robert Parkes, Zane Cohen, Robin S McLeod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Salvage procedures for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses frequently require total reconstruction with a combined abdominal and perineal approach. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for surgery and the outcomes in this group of patients.
METHODS: All patients who underwent combined abdominal and perineal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reconstruction at the Mount Sinai Hospital between 1982 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were collected prospectively in the inflammatory bowel disease database.
RESULTS: Sixty-three reconstructive procedures were performed in 57 patients, with a mean age of 33.9 (+/-10.4) years at the time of reconstruction. There were 14 males. The mean follow-up was 69.1 months. The initial indication for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was ulcerative colitis in 98 percent. The primary indication for reconstruction was pouch-vaginal fistula in 21 patients, long outlet in 14, pelvic sepsis in 14, ileoanal anastomotic stricture in 5, pouch-perineal fistula in 2, and chronic pouchitis in 1. The mean operative time was four hours (+/-1.1), the average blood loss was 500 mL (+/-400), and the average length of stay was 10.3 days (+/-4.6). All patients had a diverting ileostomy. Forty-two (73.6 percent) of the patients have a functioning pouch. Seven (12.3 percent) patients have had their pouch excised. The ileostomy has not yet been closed in 8 (14 percent) patients; 3 of these patients are awaiting closure, whereas the remaining 5 have a permanently defunctioning ileostomy. Eighty-nine percent have ten or fewer bowel movements per day. No patients are incontinent of stool during the day, whereas two patients are incontinent at night. Seventeen percent complain of frequent urgency. Despite this, more than 80 percent rate their physical and psychological health as good to excellent.
CONCLUSION: Reconstructive pouch surgery has a high success rate in experienced hands. The functional results in those whose pouch is in use are good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12130874     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6321-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

1.  Complications of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  Emre Gorgun; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

2.  Can reoperative surgery be profitable? Maximizing reimbursement.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

3.  Redo Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis combined with anti-TNF-α maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease with pelvic fistula: report of two cases.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Araki; Yoshiki Okita; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Masaki Ohi; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Transabdominal re-do pouch surgery in pediatric patients for failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a case matched study.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Eren Esen; H Hande Aydinli; Hasan T Kirat; David M Schwartzberg; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Authors:  Rowena L Ramirez; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

6.  Complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Seung-Bum Ryoo; Heung-Kwon Oh; Eon Chul Han; Heon-Kyun Ha; Sang Hui Moon; Eun Kyung Choe; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis.

Authors:  H-P Bruch; O Schwandner; S Farke; J Nolde
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  The challenge of pouch-vaginal fistulas: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Maslekar; P M Sagar; D Harji; C Bruce; B Griffiths
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  The specialty of colon and rectal surgery: its impact on patient care and role in academic medicine.

Authors:  Walter E Longo
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.