Literature DB >> 12127263

Contribution of dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate to liver tumor induction in mice by trichloroethylene.

Richard J Bull1, Gayle A Orner, Rita S Cheng, Lisa Stillwell, Anja J Stauber, Lyle B Sasser, Melissa K Lingohr, Brian D Thrall.   

Abstract

Determining the key events in the induction of liver cancer in mice by trichloroethylene (TRI) is important in the determination of how risks from this chemical should be treated at low doses. At least two metabolites can contribute to liver cancer in mice, dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA). TCA is produced from metabolism of TRI at systemic concentrations that can clearly contribute to this response. As a peroxisome proliferator and a species-specific carcinogen, TCA may not be important in the induction of liver cancer in humans at the low doses of TRI encountered in the environment. Because DCA is metabolized much more rapidly than TCA, it has not been possible to directly determine whether it is produced at carcinogenic levels. Unlike TCA, DCA is active as a carcinogen in both mice and rats. Its low-dose effects are not associated with peroxisome proliferation. The present study examines whether biomarkers for DCA and TCA can be used to determine if the liver tumor response to TRI seen in mice is completely attributable to TCA or if other metabolites, such as DCA, are involved. Previous work had shown that DCA produces tumors in mice that display a diffuse immunoreactivity to a c-Jun antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-45), whereas TCA-induced tumors do not stain with this antibody. In the present study, we compared the c-Jun phenotype of tumors induced by DCA or TCA alone to those induced when they are given together in various combinations and to those induced by TRI given in an aqueous vehicle. When given in various combinations, DCA and TCA produced a few tumors that were c-Jun+, many that were c-Jun-, but a number with a mixed phenotype that increased with the relative dose of DCA. Sixteen TRI-induced tumors were c-Jun+, 13 were c-Jun-, and 9 had a mixed phenotype. Mutations of the H-ras protooncogene were also examined in DCA-, TCA-, and TRI-induced tumors. The mutation frequency detected in tumors induced by TCA was significantly different from that observed in TRI-induced tumors (0.44 vs 0.21, p < 0.05), whereas that observed in DCA-induced tumors (0.33) was intermediate between values obtained with TCA and TRI, but not significantly different from TRI. No significant differences were found in the mutation spectra of tumors produced by the three compounds. The presence of mutations in H-ras codon 61 appeared to be a late event, but ras-dependent signaling pathways were activated in all tumors. These data are not consistent with the hypothesis that all liver tumors induced by TRI were produced by TCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12127263     DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  23 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic applications of dichloroacetate and the role of glutathione transferase zeta-1.

Authors:  Margaret O James; Stephan C Jahn; Guo Zhong; Marci G Smeltz; Zhiwei Hu; Peter W Stacpoole
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  The Contribution of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha to the Relationship Between Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Hong Sik Yoo; Joseph A Cichocki; Sungkyoon Kim; Abhishek Venkatratnam; Yasuhiro Iwata; Oksana Kosyk; Wanda Bodnar; Stephen Sweet; Anthony Knap; Terry Wade; Jerry Campbell; Harvey J Clewell; Stepan B Melnyk; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Interstrain differences in the liver effects of trichloroethylene in a multistrain panel of inbred mice.

Authors:  Blair U Bradford; Eric F Lock; Oksana Kosyk; Sungkyoon Kim; Takeki Uehara; David Harbourt; Michelle DeSimone; David W Threadgill; Volodymyr Tryndyak; Igor P Pogribny; Lisa Bleyle; Dennis R Koop; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Do Antioxidant Enzymes and Glutathione Play Roles in the Induction of Hepatic Oxidative Stress in Mice upon Subchronic Exposure to Mixtures of Dichloroacetate and Trichloroacetate?

Authors:  Ezdihar Hassoun; Jacquelyn Cearfoss
Journal:  Toxicol Environ Chem       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 5.  Trichloroethylene biotransformation and its role in mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and target organ toxicity.

Authors:  Lawrence H Lash; Weihsueh A Chiu; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.657

6.  Micronucleus induction by oxidative metabolites of trichloroethylene in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes: a comparative genotoxicity study.

Authors:  Meenu Varshney; Abhijit Chandra; L K S Chauhan; Sudhir K Goel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Genetic signature for human risk assessment: lessons from trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Yih-Horng Shiao
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  The effects of mixtures of dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate on induction of oxidative stress in livers of mice after subchronic exposure.

Authors:  Ezdihar Hassoun; Jacquelyn Cearfoss; Sukamto Mamada; Noor Al-Hassan; Michael Brown; Kevin Heimberger; Ming-Cheh Liu
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2014

9.  Evaluation of dichloroacetic acid for carcinogenicity in genetically modified Tg.AC hemizygous and p53 haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Grace E Kissling; David E Malarkey; Molly K Vallant; Jerry D Johnson; Milton R Hejtmancik; Ronald A Herbert; Gary A Boorman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  SLC transporters as a novel class of tumour suppressors: identity, function and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Yangzom D Bhutia; Ellappan Babu; Sabarish Ramachandran; Shengping Yang; Muthusamy Thangaraju; Vadivel Ganapathy
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.