Literature DB >> 12126668

Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Laurent Pothuaud1, Bert Van Rietbergen, Lis Mosekilde, Olivier Beuf, Pierre Levitz, Claude L Benhamou, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone structure may complement bone volume/total volume fraction (BV/TV) in the prediction of the mechanical properties. Nonetheless, the direct in vivo use of information pertaining to trabecular bone structure necessitates some predictive analytical model linking structure measures to mechanical properties. In this context, the purpose of this study was to combine BV/TV and topological parameters so as to better estimate the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Thirteen trabecular bone mid-sagittal sections were imaged by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at the resolution of 117 x 117x 300 microm(3). Topological parameters were evaluated in applying the 3D-line skeleton graph analysis (LSGA) technique to the binary MR images. The same images were used to estimate the elastic moduli by finite element analysis (FEA). In addition to the mid-sagittal section, two cylindrical samples were cored from each vertebra along vertical and horizontal directions. Monotonic compression tests were applied to these samples to measure both vertical and horizontal ultimate stresses. BV/TV was found as a strong predictor of the mechanical properties, accounting for 89-94% of the variability of the elastic moduli and for 69-86% of the variability of the ultimate stresses. Topological parameters and BV/TV were combined following two analytical formulations, based on: (1) the normalization of the topological parameters; and on (2) an exponential fit-model. The normalized parameters accounted for 96-98% of the variability of the elastic moduli, and the exponential model accounted for 80-95% of the variability of the ultimate stresses. Such formulations could potentially be used to increase the prediction of the mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12126668     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00060-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  18 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3D MR microscopy for trabecular bone assessment: a comparative study on calcaneus samples using 3D synchrotron radiation microtomography.

Authors:  David Last; Françoise Peyrin; Geneviève Guillot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Quantification of the roles of trabecular microarchitecture and trabecular type in determining the elastic modulus of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiaowei S Liu; Paul Sajda; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Creep of trabecular bone from the human proximal tibia.

Authors:  Ekaterina Novitskaya; Carolyn Zin; Neil Chang; Esther Cory; Peter Chen; Darryl D'Lima; Robert L Sah; Joanna McKittrick
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  Basic fibroblast growth factor improves trabecular bone connectivity and bone strength in the lumbar vertebral body of osteopenic rats.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Tamer Hadi; Yebin Jiang; Jeff Lotz; Thomas J Wronski; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantification of trabecular bone microdamage using the virtual internal bond model and the individual trabeculae segmentation technique.

Authors:  Guanhui Fang; Baohua Ji; X Sherry Liu; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  In vivo application of 3D-line skeleton graph analysis (LSGA) technique with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  Laurent Pothuaud; David C Newitt; Ying Lu; Brian MacDonald; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Trabecular bone mechanical properties in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Jaclynn M Kreider; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effect of alendronate sodium on trabecular bone structure in an osteoporotic rat model.

Authors:  Esin Tokmak Tokmak Özşahin; Burcu Çam; Fahri Dere; Mehmet Kürkçü; Cüneyt Evrüke; Roger Soames; Özkan Oğuz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-03

9.  First meeting on bone quality, Abbaye des Vaux de Cernay, France, 15-16 June 2006: Bone architecture.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.071

10.  Evaluation of different grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair in the context of orthodontic tooth movement in rats.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Zuzanna Magnuska; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Felix Gremse; Frank Hölzle; Gholamreza Danesh; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.