Literature DB >> 12125995

Visual influence on postural control, with and without visual motion feedback.

Anna Hafström1, Per-Anders Fransson, Mikael Karlberg, Torbjörn Ledin, Måns Magnusson.   

Abstract

Body sway was investigated in 20 healthy subjects to determine whether visual input must contain motion feedback information from the surroundings in order to influence postural control. Posturography was used to record body sway under the following visual conditions: eyes open with or without a restricted visual field; eyes open in ganzfield white light; eyes open in darkness with a head-fixed visual target; eyes open in darkness; and eyes closed in darkness. Stance was perturbed by means of a pseudorandomly applied vibratory stimulation to the calf muscles. Least sway was found with eyes open in an unrestricted visual field but increased in a restricted visual field. Greatest sway was found without visual motion feedback, i.e. under the following conditions: eyes closed; eyes open in darkness; eyes open in ganzfield white light; and with a head-mounted fixation point. Sway was significantly (p < 0.05) greater with eyes open in darkness compared with eyes closed during the initial 50 s with perturbations. After 150 s, sway was almost identical under the four test conditions without visual motion feedback. Standing with eyes open in darkness was initially a disadvantage compared with having the eyes closed. The postural control system may be programmed to expect visual feedback information when the eyes are open, which may delay changes in postural strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12125995     DOI: 10.1080/00016480260000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  9 in total

1.  Influence of enhanced visual feedback on postural control and spinal reflex modulation during stance.

Authors:  Wolfgang Taube; Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensorimotor control of the trunk in sitting sway referencing.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Kimberly Tetreault; Jeffrey Lanman; Tate Klidonas; Seyoung Kim; Sandra Saavedra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Veering in hemi-Parkinson's disease: Primacy of visual over motor contributions.

Authors:  Xiaolin Ren; Robert Salazar; Sandy Neargarder; Serge Roy; Terry D Ellis; Elliot Saltzman; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Influence of pathologic and simulated visual dysfunctions on the postural system.

Authors:  Michaela Friedrich; Hans-Juergen Grein; Carola Wicher; Juliane Schuetze; Anja Mueller; Andreas Lauenroth; Kuno Hottenrott; Rene Schwesig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Physiologic complexity and aging: implications for physical function and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Brad Manor; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Different Visual Weighting due to Fast or Slow Vestibular Deafferentation: Before and after Schwannoma Surgery.

Authors:  Fredrik Tjernström; Per-Anders Fransson; Babar Kahlon; Mikael Karlberg; Sven Lindberg; Peter Siesjö; Måns Magnusson
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  The interplay between cognitive tasks and vision for upright posture balance in adolescents.

Authors:  Hai-Jiang Meng; Shan-Shan Luo; Yuan-Gang Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Different visual manipulations have similar effects on quasi-static and dynamic balance responses of young and older people.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidt; Felipe P Carpes; Thomas L Milani; Andresa M C Germano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults.

Authors:  Mônica S V Tomomitsu; Angelica Castilho Alonso; Eurica Morimoto; Tatiana G Bobbio; Julia M D Greve
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.