Literature DB >> 12125794

Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique.

R W Wassell1, D Barker, A W G Walls.   

Abstract

Well-fitting indirect restorations can only be made if there are accurate models of the oral tissues available, made from high quality impressions. Waiting for an impression to set may be more stressful for the dentist than the patient. Should the impression need to be repeated there is the embarrassment of having to explain this to the patient, the cost implications of material and time wasted and the aggravation of running late for the next appointment. Yet, if a 'Nelsonian' eye is turned to a defective impression we can only expect a substandard restoration in return.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12125794     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  16 in total

1.  Mini-invasive impression techniques in fixed prothesis: an alternative to traditional procedures.

Authors:  M Bonino; G DE Vico; D Spinelli; I Conti; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-29

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Four Impression Techniques using Polyether Impression Material.

Authors:  Smita Sara Manoj; K P Cherian; Vidya Chitre; Meena Aras
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-02-06

3.  Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Ashley J George; Scott Durand; Sepideh Malekpour; Don G Marshall; Cyril Meyerowitz; Lauren Carter; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Preparation Techniques Used to Make Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Helena M Minyé; Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; Rahma Mungia; Cyril Meyerowitz; David R Louis; Alan Slootsky; Valeria V Gordan; Michael S McCracken
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Ueda; Florian Beuer; Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Christine Keul; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  A Paradigm shift in the concept for making dental impressions.

Authors:  Sanjna Nayar; R Mahadevan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

7.  Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Rina Singh; Jagjit Singh; Ramandeep S Gambhir; Ramanpreet Singh; Sonia Nanda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-07-01

Review 8.  Clinical applications of ferric sulfate in dentistry: A narrative review.

Authors:  Madhuri Bandi; Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review.

Authors:  Safari S; Vossoghi Sheshkalani Ma; Vossoghi Sheshkalani Mi; Hoseini Ghavam F; Hamedi M
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2016-06

10.  Evaluation of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Light and Heat Polymerized UDMA for DLP 3D Printer.

Authors:  Qutaiba Alsandi; Masaomi Ikeda; Yoshinori Arisaka; Toru Nikaido; Yumi Tsuchida; Alireza Sadr; Nobuhiko Yui; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.