Literature DB >> 12124781

In vivo evaluation of a bioactive scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

T Livingston1, P Ducheyne, J Garino.   

Abstract

Revision cases of total hip implants are complicated by the significant amount of bone loss. New materials and/or approaches are needed to provide stability to the site, stimulate bone formation, and ultimately lead to fully functional bone tissue. Porous bioactive glasses (prepared from 45S5 granules, 45% SiO2, 24.5% Na2O, 24.5% CaO, and 6% P2O5) have been developed as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and have been studied in vitro. In this study, we investigated the incorporation of tissue-engineered constructs utilizing these scaffolds in large, cortical bone defects in the rat simulating revision conditions. With implantation times of 2, 4, and 12 weeks the results were compared to those using the bioactive ceramic scaffold alone. Two tissue-engineered constructs were studied: osteoprogenitor cells that were either seeded onto the scaffold prior to implantation ("primary") or those that were culture expanded to form bonelike tissue on the scaffold prior to implantation ("hybrid"). Defects treated with the hybrid had the greatest amount of bone in the available pore space of the defect over all other groups at 2 weeks (p < 0.05). For both the primary and hybrid groups, woven and lamellar bone was present along the interface of the scaffold and the host cortex and within the porous space of the scaffold at 2 weeks. By 4 weeks, very uniform, lamellar bone was present throughout the scaffold for both tissue-engineered groups. The amount of bone significantly increased over time for all groups while the bioactive ceramic gradually resorbed by 40% at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). Structural properties of the treated long bones improved over time. Long bones treated with the hybrid had an early return in torsional stiffness by 2 weeks. Both tissue-engineered constructs achieved normal torsional strength and stiffness by 4 weeks as compared to the scaffold alone, which achieved this by 12 weeks. Porous, surface modified bioactive ceramic is a promising scaffold material for tissue-engineered bone repair. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12124781     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  29 in total

1.  Collagen microcarrier spinner culture promotes osteoblast proliferation and synthesis of matrix proteins.

Authors:  Michael Overstreet; Afshin Sohrabi; Anna Polotsky; David S Hungerford; Carmelita G Frondoza
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Processing and characterization of innovative scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  D Bellucci; F Chiellini; G Ciardelli; M Gazzarri; P Gentile; A Sola; V Cannillo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  New biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Diana Chicon Paez; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

4.  Bioglass as a carrier for reindeer bone protein extract in the healing of rat femur defect.

Authors:  Hanna Tölli; Sauli Kujala; Katri Levonen; Timo Jämsä; Pekka Jalovaara
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Macroporous bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  C Vitale Brovarone; E Verné; P Appendino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Gene activation by bioactive glasses.

Authors:  G Jell; M M Stevens
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Premixed macroporous calcium phosphate cement scaffold.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Lisa E Carey; Carl G Simon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds.

Authors:  Viviana Mouriño; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

10.  Strong, macroporous, and in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement-layered structures.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Elena F Burguera; Lisa E Carey
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.