Literature DB >> 12123440

Trends and characteristics of induced labour in the United States, 1989-98.

Marian F MacDorman1, T J Mathews, Joyce A Martin, Michael H Malloy.   

Abstract

Induction of labour is one of the fastest growing medical procedures in the United States. In 1998, 19.2% of all US births were a product of induced labour, more than twice the 9.0% in 1989. Induction of labour has been efficacious in the management of post-term pregnancy and in expediting delivery when the mother or infant is sufficiently ill to make continuation of the pregnancy hazardous. However, the recent rapid increase in induction, and particularly the doubling of the induction rate for preterm pregnancies (from 6.7% in 1989 to 13.4% in 1998), has generated concern among some clinicians. The present study uses vital statistics natality data to examine the epidemiology of induced labour in the US. Multivariable analysis is used to examine the probability of having an induced delivery in relation to a wide variety of socio-demographic and medical characteristics, and also in relation to relative indications and contraindications for induced labour as outlined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Induction rates were higher for women who were non-Hispanic white, college educated, born in the US, primaparae and those with intensive prenatal care utilisation. Induction rates were also higher for women with various medical conditions including hypertension, eclampsia and renal disease. For non-Hispanic white women with singleton births, 59% of the increase in the preterm birth rate from 1989 to 1998 can be accounted for by the increase in preterm inductions. The adjusted odds ratio for neonatal mortality among preterm births with induced labour was 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.11, 1.31]. The rapid increase in induction rates, particularly among preterm births, marks a shift in the obstetric management of pregnancy. More detailed studies are needed to examine physician decision-making protocols, particularly for preterm induction, and to assess the impact of these practice changes on patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12123440     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00425.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  12 in total

1.  The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: the accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records.

Authors:  Heather B Clayton; William M Sappenfield; Elizabeth Gulitz; Charles S Mahan; Donna J Petersen; Kara M Stanley; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  Temporal changes in socioeconomic influences on health: maternal education and preterm birth.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Changes in the relationship between marriage and preterm birth, 1989-2006.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Trends in elective labor induction for six United States health plans, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Association of late-preterm birth with asthma in young children: practice-based study.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Alexander G Fiks; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Gestational age at term delivery and children's neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Jessica L Gleason; Stephen E Gilman; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Edwina Yeung; Diane L Putnick; Yassaman Vafai; Abhisek Saha; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 8.  Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

9.  Unmet need for induction of labor in Africa: secondary analysis from the 2004 - 2005 WHO Global Maternal and Perinatal Health Survey (A cross-sectional survey).

Authors:  Fawole Bukola; Nafiou Idi; Machoki M'Mimunya; Wolomby-Molondo Jean-Jose; Mugerwa Kidza; Neves Isilda; Amokrane Faouzi; Shah Archana; Souza Joao Paulo; Mathai Matthews; Gulmezoglu Metin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Ambient Fine Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Preterm Birth in New York City.

Authors:  Sarah Johnson; Jennifer F Bobb; Kazuhiko Ito; David A Savitz; Beth Elston; Jessie L C Shmool; Francesca Dominici; Zev Ross; Jane E Clougherty; Thomas Matte
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.