Literature DB >> 12123438

Deprivation and stillbirth risk in rural and urban areas.

Heather O Dickinson1, Jane L Hutton, Lynda H Greaves, Trevor J B Dummer, Louise Parker.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate whether stillbirth risk was higher, and the effect of deprivation on inequality in stillbirth risk more marked, in rural than in urban areas. We carried out a cohort study of all 280 757 singleton births to mothers domiciled in Cumbria, north-west England, 1950-92. After allowing for individual social class and community deprivation, the risk of stillbirth was lower outside urban centres both during 1950-65 (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84, 1.00) and during 1966-92 (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.73, 0.92). In earlier years, unsupported mothers in rural areas and mothers living in remote areas were particularly at risk. Urban/rural differences in risk were not explained by individual social class, community deprivation or overcrowding and have persisted over a 40-year time period.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12123438     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  2 in total

1.  Famine, social disruption, and involuntary fetal loss: evidence from Chinese survey data.

Authors:  Yong Cai; Wang Feng
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2005-05

2.  Inequalities and stillbirth in the UK: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Devender Roberts; Mark A Turner; Claire Storey; Nicola Crossland; Kenneth William Finlayson; Soo Downe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.