Literature DB >> 12122788

Intraindividual comparison of two different skin care conceptions in patients undergoing radiotherapy of the head-and-neck region. Creme or powder?

Ulrike Schreck1, Frank Paulsen, Michael Bamberg, Wilfried Budach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated for the first time in intraindividual comparison the conception of care with creme or powder. Acute skin reactions on the left and right side of the neck during symmetrically performed radiotherapy and subjective impairment were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients receiving radiotherapy of the head-and-neck region up to 50, 60, 66 and 72 Gy, respectively, were asked to treat one side of the neck with creme, the contralateral side with powder after random assignment. Objective and subjective assessment and photodocumentation were performed at therapy onset and weekly during therapy. The photodocumentation provides an impressive course of acute skin reactions under these care concepts.
RESULTS: Altogether we saw no relevant difference in favor of care with creme or powder according to objective as well as subjective assessment criteria (Figure 2 and 3). In this intraindividual comparison the results are independent from interindividual different sensitivity to radiotherapy, total dose or fractionation. Therefore the small patient number is a minor limitation for evidence. Our results are in accordance to trials comparing other care concepts.
CONCLUSIONS: A relevant effect concerning onset and degree of acute skin reactions or differences in symptom relief could not be demonstrated. Both conceptions are to be regarded equal in terms of subjective symptom relief and in extent of acute skin reactions. The lack of differences may be explained by the fact that the underlying pathophysiological processes cannot be influenced by topical agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122788     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-002-0912-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  5 in total

Review 1.  The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline.

Authors:  Amanda Bolderston; Nancy S Lloyd; Rebecca K S Wong; Lori Holden; Linda Robb-Blenderman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late radiation reactions from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group.

Authors:  Rebecca K S Wong; René-Jean Bensadoun; Christine B Boers-Doets; Jane Bryce; Alexandre Chan; Joel B Epstein; Beth Eaby-Sandy; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Treatment of acute radiodermatitis with an oil-in-water emulsion following radiation therapy for breast cancer: a controlled, randomized trial.

Authors:  Jens-Michael Jensen; Tanja Gau; Jürgen Schultze; Gunter Lemmnitz; Regina Fölster-Holst; Theodor May; Christoph Abels; Ehrhardt Proksch
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Topical use of olive oil preparation to prevent radiodermatitis: results of a prospective study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Cui; Mei Xin; Haiying Yin; Jiandong Zhang; Fei Han
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Prophylaxis and management of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  N Salvo; E Barnes; J van Draanen; E Stacey; G Mitera; D Breen; A Giotis; G Czarnota; J Pang; C De Angelis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.