Literature DB >> 12122559

Toxicokinetics and effects of fibrous and nonfibrous particles.

Günter Oberdörster1.   

Abstract

Chronic inhalation of fibrous and nonfibrous particles by rats at high concentrations results in lung tumor formation if the particles are poorly soluble in the lung. Even rather benign nonfibrous particles such as TiO(2) produce this result. One significant change during a chronic inhalation exposure of poorly soluble particles of low cytotoxicity (PSP) is an impairment of normal clearance mechanisms in the alveolar region of the lung in rats, resulting in a continued buildup to high lung burdens accompanied by chronic alveolar inflammation, fibrosis, and mutational events. Since these are obviously high-dose effects, questions about their extrapolation to humans exposed to much lower concentrations have been raised. Results of key studies reported for chronic inhalation of PSP in rats indicate that mechanisms of PSP-induced lung tumors at high doses do not operate at low dose levels. Furthermore, the existence of two thresholds can be postulated: One is a dosimetric threshold for the endpoint alveolar macrophage-mediated clearance, which is related to lung particle overload. The other is a mechanistic threshold for the endpoint mutation, which is determined by the level of antioxidant defenses to counterbalance reactive oxidant species released by activated inflammatory cells. A no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) could therefore be based on avoiding alteration of the toxicokinetic of the particles such that the lung burdens stay below the dosimetric threshold. The suggestion that PSP-associated organic compounds (e.g., diesel particulate matter) contribute to the lung tumor responses in rats observed in chronic inhalation studies is not supported by experimental data from in vivo studies. It can be concluded that high-dose rat lung tumors due to PSP should not be used for low-dose extrapolations, and no significant contribution to human lung cancer risk can be predicted from levels of PSP below lung overload. With respect to the pulmonary toxicokinetics of inhaled fibrous particles, the biopersistence of long fibers (>20 microm) which cannot be phagocytized by alveolar macrophages is a key parameter related to long-term carcinogenic effects. Long fibers with a very low biopersistence should not be considered as carcinogenic. Since the clearance kinetics of fibers can generally be described by a biphasic or multiphasic pattern-fast initial and slow final phase-it is essential that the slow phase of the retention kinetics of fibers longer than 20 microm is considered in a biopersistence assay. Based on the results of such assay, fibers can be classified into one of two categories: a biopersistent fiber that cannot be dissolved in the lung within an acceptable time period; or a biosoluble fiber when even long nonphagocytizable fibers will be disappearing rapidly from the lung. However, in addition to biopersistence, it should be mandatory to evaluate fiber toxicity in an appropriate assay relative to a fiber whose long-term effects are well known. Moreover, for organic fibers it is likely that different rules may have to be established for characterization of their toxic and carcinogenic potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122559     DOI: 10.1080/089583701753338622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  28 in total

Review 1.  The impact of nanomaterial characteristics on inhalation toxicity.

Authors:  Frank S Bierkandt; Lars Leibrock; Sandra Wagener; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Nanomaterial interactions with and trafficking across the lung alveolar epithelial barrier: implications for health effects of air-pollution particles.

Authors:  Nazanin R Yacobi; Farnoosh Fazllolahi; Yong Ho Kim; Arnold Sipos; Zea Borok; Kwang-Jin Kim; Edward D Crandall
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.763

3.  Can Control Banding be Useful for the Safe Handling of Nanomaterials? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adrienne Eastlake; Ralph Zumwalde; Charles Geraci
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Diameter and rigidity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes are critical factors in mesothelial injury and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Hirotaka Nagai; Yasumasa Okazaki; Shan Hwu Chew; Nobuaki Misawa; Yoriko Yamashita; Shinya Akatsuka; Toshikazu Ishihara; Kyoko Yamashita; Yutaka Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Yasui; Li Jiang; Hiroki Ohara; Takashi Takahashi; Gaku Ichihara; Kostas Kostarelos; Yasumitsu Miyata; Hisanori Shinohara; Shinya Toyokuni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 6.  From Dose to Response: In Vivo Nanoparticle Processing and Potential Toxicity.

Authors:  Uschi M Graham; Gary Jacobs; Robert A Yokel; Burtron H Davis; Alan K Dozier; M Eileen Birch; Michael T Tseng; Günter Oberdörster; Alison Elder; Lisa DeLouise
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Elemental and immunohistochemical analysis of the lungs and hilar lymph node in a patient with asbestos exposure, a pilot study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Koga; Takahiro Satoh; Kyoichi Kaira; Masashi Koka; Takeshi Hisada; Junko Hirato; Bolag Altan; Masakiyo Yatomi; Akihiro Ono; Yosuke Kamide; Yasuo Shimizu; Haruka Aoki-Saito; Hiroaki Tsurumaki; Kimihiro Shimizu; Akira Mogi; Tamotsu Ishizuka; Masanobu Yamada; Kunio Dobashi
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 8.  In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity.

Authors:  Clinton F Jones; David W Grainger
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  What is responsible for the carcinogenicity of PM2.5?

Authors:  R M Harrison; D J T Smith; A J Kibble
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Mesothelioma: Do asbestos and carbon nanotubes pose the same health risk?

Authors:  Marie-Claude F Jaurand; Annie Renier; Julien Daubriac
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.