R M Akuse1, E A Obinya. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Because prelacteal feeds can adversely affect breastfeeding, UNICEF/WHO discourage their use unless medically indicated. The study was carried out to determine the proportion of healthcare workers who routinely give prelacteal feeds, and their reasons for doing so; further, to determine whether any differences exist between medically and non-medically trained healthcare workers in their administration of prelacteal feeds. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities in Kaduna township Nigeria. SUBJECTS: Of 1100 healthcare workers sampled, 747 (68%) responded. Of these 80% had received medical training, 20% had not. METHODS: Use of a pretested validated questionnaire. RESULTS: Large proportions of both medical and non-medically trained healthcare workers stated they routinely give prelacteal feeds (doctors, 68.2%; nurses, 70.2%; and non-medical, 73.6%). However their reasons for doing so differed significantly (P=0.00001). Nurses gave mainly for perceived breast milk insufficiency, doctors for prevention of dehydration, hypoglycaemia and neonatal jaundice and non-medical staff to prepare the gastrointestinal tract for digestion and to quench thirst. CONCLUSIONS: Most healthcare workers (medical and non-medical) routinely and unnecessarily give prelacteal feeds. Therefore training and retraining programmes in lactation management are necessary and must include non-medical staff. These programmes, while emphasizing the danger of giving prelacteal feeds, must deal with the misconceptions of each group. Deliberate efforts have to be made to incorporate clinical training in breastfeeding in curricula of Schools of Medicine and Nursing.
OBJECTIVE: Because prelacteal feeds can adversely affect breastfeeding, UNICEF/WHO discourage their use unless medically indicated. The study was carried out to determine the proportion of healthcare workers who routinely give prelacteal feeds, and their reasons for doing so; further, to determine whether any differences exist between medically and non-medically trained healthcare workers in their administration of prelacteal feeds. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities in Kaduna township Nigeria. SUBJECTS: Of 1100 healthcare workers sampled, 747 (68%) responded. Of these 80% had received medical training, 20% had not. METHODS: Use of a pretested validated questionnaire. RESULTS: Large proportions of both medical and non-medically trained healthcare workers stated they routinely give prelacteal feeds (doctors, 68.2%; nurses, 70.2%; and non-medical, 73.6%). However their reasons for doing so differed significantly (P=0.00001). Nurses gave mainly for perceived breast milk insufficiency, doctors for prevention of dehydration, hypoglycaemia and neonatal jaundice and non-medical staff to prepare the gastrointestinal tract for digestion and to quench thirst. CONCLUSIONS: Most healthcare workers (medical and non-medical) routinely and unnecessarily give prelacteal feeds. Therefore training and retraining programmes in lactation management are necessary and must include non-medical staff. These programmes, while emphasizing the danger of giving prelacteal feeds, must deal with the misconceptions of each group. Deliberate efforts have to be made to incorporate clinical training in breastfeeding in curricula of Schools of Medicine and Nursing.
Authors: Susana Martín-Iglesias; Isabel del-Cura-González; Teresa Sanz-Cuesta; Celina Arana-Cañedo Argüelles; Mercedes Rumayor-Zarzuelo; Marta Alvarez-de la Riva; Ana M Lloret-Sáez Bravo; Rosa M Férnandez-Arroyo; José L Aréjula-Torres; Óscar Aguado-Arroyo; Francisco Góngora-Maldonado; Manuela García-Corraliza; Nazareth Sandoval-Encinas; Margarita Tomico-delRío; Ana M Cornejo-Gutiérrez Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Dyah Ayu Inayati; Veronika Scherbaum; Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri; Elizabeth Hormann; Nia Novita Wirawan; Julia Suryantan; Susan Hartono; Maurice Alexander Bloem; Rosnani Verba Pangaribuan; Hans Konrad Biesalski; Volker Hoffmann; Anne Camilla Bellows Journal: Int Breastfeed J Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 3.461
Authors: Ellen G Piwoz; Yvonne Owens Ferguson; Margaret E Bentley; Amy L Corneli; Agnes Moses; Jacqueline Nkhoma; Beth Carlton Tohill; Beatrice Mtimuni; Yusuf Ahmed; Denise J Jamieson; Charles van der Horst; Peter Kazembe Journal: Int Breastfeed J Date: 2006-03-09 Impact factor: 3.461
Authors: Kingsley E Agho; Pascal Ogeleka; Felix A Ogbo; Osita K Ezeh; John Eastwood; Andrew Page Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv Engebretsen; Thorkild Tylleskär; Henry Wamani; Charles Karamagi; James K Tumwine Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 3.295