Literature DB >> 12122147

Loads, capacities and safety factors of maltase and the glucose transporter SGLT1 in mouse intestinal brush border.

Mandy M Lam1, Timothy P O'Connor, Jared Diamond.   

Abstract

Safety factors are defined as ratios of biological capacities to prevailing natural loads. We measured the safety factor of the mouse intestinal brush-border hydrolase maltase in series with the glucose transporter SGLT1, for comparison with previous studies of sucrase and lactase. Dietary maltose loads increased 4-fold from virgin to lactating mice. As in previous studies of intestinal adaptive regulation, that increase in load without change in dietary composition resulted in an increase in maltase and SGLT1 capacities mediated non-specifically by an increase in intestinal mass, without change in maltase or SGLT1 activities per milligram of tissue. Maltase and SGLT1 capacities increased only sublinearly with load during lactation, such that safety factors decreased with load: from 6.5 to 2.4 for maltase, and from 1.1 to 0.5 for SGLT1. The apparently high safety factor for maltase may be related to the multiple natural substrates hydrolysed by the multiple sites of maltase activity. The apparently low safety factor for SGLT1 is made possible by the contribution of hindgut fermentation to carbohydrate digestion. SGLT1 activity is paradoxically higher for mice consuming sucrose than for mice consuming maltose, despite maltose hydrolysis yielding double the glucose load yielded by sucrose hydrolysis, and despite glucose constituting the load upon SGLT1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122147      PMCID: PMC2290422          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.023275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative evolutionary design.

Authors:  Jared Diamond
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Assay of intestinal disaccharidases.

Authors:  A Dahlqvist
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Pig intestinal microvillar maltase-glucoamylase. Structure and membrane insertion.

Authors:  O Norén; H Sjöström; G M Cowell; J Tranum-Jensen; O C Hansen; K G Welinder
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Adaptive regulation of sugar and amino acid transport by vertebrate intestine.

Authors:  W H Karasov; J M Diamond
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-10

5.  Amphiphilic pig intestinal microvillus maltase/glucoamylase. Structure and specificity.

Authors:  S H Sørensen; O Norén; H Sjöström; E M Danielsen
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1982-09-01

Review 6.  Factors of safety in the structure of animals.

Authors:  R M Alexander
Journal:  Sci Prog       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.774

7.  Role of oral intake in maintenance of gut mass and disaccharide activity.

Authors:  G M Levine; J J Deren; E Steiger; R Zinno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  The facilitated component of intestinal glucose absorption.

Authors:  G L Kellett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Brush border membrane sucrase-isomaltase, maltase-glucoamylase and trehalase in mammals. Comparative development, effects of glucocorticoids, molecular mechanisms, and phylogenetic implications.

Authors:  G Galand
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1989

10.  Use of hydrogen gas (H2) analysis to assess intestinal absorption. Studies in normal rats and in rats infected with the nematode, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis.

Authors:  E A Carter; K J Bloch; S Cohen; K J Isselbacher; W A Walker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  11 in total

1.  Intestinal hexose absorption: transcellular or paracellular fluxes.

Authors:  Chris I Cheeseman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Quantitative evolutionary design.

Authors:  Jared Diamond
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Flux control and excess capacity in the enzymes of glycolysis and their relationship to flight metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Walter F Eanes; Thomas J S Merritt; Jonathan M Flowers; Seiji Kumagai; Efe Sezgin; Chen-Tseh Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of three simultaneous demands on glucose transport, resting metabolism and morphology of laboratory mice.

Authors:  Deborah M Kristan; Kimberly A Hammond
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Spare capacity and phenotypic flexibility in the digestive system of a migratory bird: defining the limits of animal design.

Authors:  Scott R McWilliams; William H Karasov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Intestinal mucosal adaptation.

Authors:  Laurie Drozdowski; Alan B R Thomson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Morphological, kinetic, membrane biochemical and genetic aspects of intestinal enteroplasticity.

Authors:  Laurie A Drozdowski; M Tom Clandinin; Alan B R Thomson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  DES2 protein is responsible for phytoceramide biosynthesis in the mouse small intestine.

Authors:  Fumio Omae; Masao Miyazaki; Ayako Enomoto; Minoru Suzuki; Yusuke Suzuki; Akemi Suzuki
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Involvement of amino acid 36 in TM1 in voltage sensitivity in mouse Na+/glucose cotransporter SGLT1.

Authors:  Ana Díez-Sampedro
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  Intestinal adaptations to a combination of different diets with and without endurance exercise.

Authors:  Janice L Daniels; Richard J Bloomer; Marie van der Merwe; Samantha L Davis; Karyl K Buddington; Randal K Buddington
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.