Literature DB >> 12120789

Spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing effects on psychometric functions for contrast detection.

Yoshio Ohtani1, Shuji Mori.   

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing on psychometric functions for contrast detection of sinusoidal gratings are examined. For this purpose, psychometric functions were collected from 4 subjects under fixed-frequency, randomized-frequency, and cued-frequency conditions. The experiment was conducted with a temporal two-alternative forced-choice task, and five spatial frequencies in the range of 0.5 and 8.0 c/deg and seven contrast levels for each frequency were used. The results showed that the psychometric functions for the randomized-frequency condition were shallower than those for the fixed-frequency condition, supporting the single-band model for the uncertainty effects (Hübner, 1993a, 1993b). For the cued-frequency condition, the slopes of the functions were not clearly different from those for the randomized condition. These results clearly differ from those of Hübner (1996b), which showed, in the spatial two-alternative forced-choice task, steeper psychometric functions for the randomized-frequency condition than those for the fixed- and cued-frequency conditions, supporting the multiple-band model (Hübner, 1993a, 1993b). The difference suggests that the single-band model applies to the uncertainty effects in the temporal forced-choice task, whereas the multiple-band model does so in the spatial forced-choice task.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120789     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Response of the human eye to spatially sinusoidal gratings at various exposure durations.

Authors:  L E Arend
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Distraction of attention and the slope of the psychometric function.

Authors:  L L Kontsevich; C W Tyler
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The efficiency of different cue types for reducing spatial-frequency uncertainty.

Authors:  R Hübner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Different ways of modeling spatial-frequency uncertainty in visual signal detection.

Authors:  R Hübner
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Detection and identification of spatial frequency: models and data.

Authors:  D Yager; P Kramer; M Shaw; N Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Simultaneous measurement of spatial-frequency summation and uncertainty effects.

Authors:  P Kramer; N Graham; D Yager
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns.

Authors:  E T Davis; P Kramer; N Graham
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-01

10.  Spatial frequency uncertainty effects in the detection of sinusoidal gratings.

Authors:  E T Davis; N Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.