Literature DB >> 12120714

Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques.

Ingrid E Andersson-Wenckert1, Jan W V van Dijken, Per Hörstedt.   

Abstract

The sandwich technique with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) has been proposed to relieve the contraction stresses of direct resin composite (RC) restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interfacial adaptation to enamel and dentin of modified Class II open RMGIC/RC sandwich restorations and the influence of different light curing techniques and matrix bands. Forty box-shaped Class II fillings were placed in vivo in premolars scheduled for extraction after one month. In groups I and II, a metal matrix was used; RC was inserted with horizontal (group I) and diagonal (group II) increments and cured with indirect/direct light. Group III was performed as group II, but a transparent matrix was used. Group IV was as group II, but with a separating liner between RMGIC and RC. Group V was a closed sandwich restoration. Interfacial quality was studied using SEM replica technique. Gap-free interfacial adaptation to enamel was observed for RMGIC in 70%, for RC in 70% and to dentin for RMGIC in 81%, for RC in 56%. No significant differences were seen between the experimental groups. At the cervical margins, RMGIC showed significantly better adaptation to enamel than RC, 74% and 42%, respectively. In conclusion, the investigated restorations showed a high percentage of gap-free interfacial adaptation in vivo. Interfacial adaptation to dentin and to cervical enamel was significantly better for RMGIC than for RC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120714     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.11210.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  12 in total

1.  Radiopacity of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Tomaž Hitij; Aleš Fidler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 7. Minimal intervention in cariology: the role of glass-ionomer cements in the preservation of tooth structures against caries.

Authors:  H Ngo; S Opsahl-Vital
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Emel Karaman; Busra Keskin; Ugur Inan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 5.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Ivy Peltz; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Interfacial adaptation of a calcium aluminate cement used in class II cavities, in vivo.

Authors:  K Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; J W V van Dijken; A Lindberg; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Clinical study on resin composite and glass ionomer materials in II class restorations in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Piotr Rożniatowski; Emil Korporowicz; Dariusz Gozdowski; Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Transmission of composite polymerization contraction force through a flowable composite and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Castañeda-Espinosa; Rosana Aparecida Pereira; Ana Paula Cavalcanti; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of internal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite and bonding agent applied as a liner under composite restoration: A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M Soubhagya; K Mallikarjun Goud; B S Deepak; Sophia Thakur; T N Nandini; J Arun
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04

10.  Bond strength between composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer using different adhesive systems and curing techniques.

Authors:  Alireza Boruziniat; Samineh Gharaei
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.