Literature DB >> 12119808

Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.

Salim Rahimtoola1, Evert van Amerongen.   

Abstract

The atraumatic restorative treatment technique (ART) is based on removing infected tooth material using only hand instruments and filling the subsequently cleaned cavity with adhesive material such as glass ionomer. As its name suggests, the ART technique should be atraumatic during treatment, as well as for the tooth itself as for the patient. It was primarily developed for treating people living in underserved areas of the world where resources and facilities such as electricity and trained manpower are limited. Many studies have evaluated the ART technique and the results have supported its application. However, a very limited number of studies have compared ART with more conventional techniques. For that reason, a study was conducted in Pakistan, to compare the ART technique with another more conventional treatment technique. The results of this study show that the preparations with hand instruments resulted in smaller sized cavities and therefore may be less traumatic to the tooth. It was also associated with less pain reactions compared to the more conventional technique. Although preparations with hand instruments required more time, this did not seem to affect the survival of restorations. The survival of glass ionomer cement restorations made with hand instruments was comparable with single surface amalgam restorations made with a more conventional technique. Recurrent caries was not associated with any glass ionomer cement restorations made with hand instruments. The retention rate of glass ionomer sealants was low, however one dentist had a sealant retention rate of 81.5 percent that suggests that this procedure can be performed satisfactorily in conjunction with a glass ionomer cement restoration. Operator variances did seem to affect the restorations. Survival of glass ionomer restorations made with both hand and rotary instruments varied for different operators. Similarly, the retention of fissure sealant also varied amongst operators. Operator differences also influenced the extent of tooth substance lost due to cavity preparation. The ART technique is a feasible approach towards the treatment of dental caries especially of one-surface lesions for underserved populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12119808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child        ISSN: 1945-1954


  17 in total

Review 1.  Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo G de Amorim; Soraya C Leal; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not?

Authors:  C P J M Boon; N L Visser; A M Kemoli; W E van Amerongen
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-10

Review 3.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal; Avijit Banerjee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.

Authors:  A M Kemoli; W E van Amerongen; G Opinya
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-12

5.  Atraumatic restorative treatment-ART in early childhood caries in babies: 4 years of randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel Demétrio Faustino-Silva; Márcia Cançado Figueiredo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G de Amorim; J E Frencken; D P Raggio; X Chen; X Hu; S C Leal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-03-11

Review 8.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Maria José Martinez-Zapata; Tanya Walsh; Valeria Cc Marinho; Aubrey Sheiham Deceased; Carlos Zaror
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-28

9.  A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.

Authors:  Clarissa-Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Marcelo Bönecker; Cor Van Loveren; W Evert Van Amerongen; Daniela-Prócida Raggio
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01

10.  Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population.

Authors:  M C M van Gemert-Schriks; W E van Amerongen; J M ten Cate; I H A Aartman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.