Literature DB >> 12119659

An updated systematic review of interventions to improve health professionals' management of obesity.

E L Harvey1, A M Glenny, S F L Kirk, C D Summerbell.   

Abstract

The objective of this article was twofold (1) to determine the existence and effectiveness of interventions to improve health professionals' management of obesity or the organization of care for overweight and obese people; and (2) to update a previous systematic review on this topic with new or additional studies. The study design was a systematic review of intervention studies, undertaken according to standard methods developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group. Participants were trained health care professionals and overweight and obese patients. The measurements were objective measures of health professionals' practice and behaviours, and patient outcomes including satisfaction, behaviour, psychological factors, disease status, risk factors and measures of body weight, fat, or body mass index (BMI). Twelve studies were included in the original review. A further six were included in this update. Six of the 18 studies were randomized controlled trials of health professional-oriented interventions (such as the use of reminders and training) and one was a controlled before-and-after study to improve collaboration between a hospital clinic and general practitioners (GPs). Ten randomized controlled trials and two controlled clinical trials of interventions comparing either the deliverer of weight-loss interventions or the setting of the delivery of the intervention, were identified. The heterogeneity and generally limited quality of identified studies make it difficult to provide recommendations for improving health professionals' obesity management. To conclude, at present, there are few solid leads about improving obesity management, although reminder systems, brief training interventions, shared care, inpatient care and dietitian-led treatments may all be worth further investigation. Therefore, decisions for the improvement of provision of services must be based on the existing evidence on interventions with patients and good clinical judgement. Further research is needed to identify cost-effective strategies for improving the management of obesity. A full version of this review (including detailed descriptions of the included studies and their methodological quality, and results and excluded studies tables) is available in the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Library is a database of systematic review and other evidence on the effects of health care, continuously updated as new information emerges. It is available on CD ROM from Update Software. For further information see: http://www.update-software.com/cochrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12119659     DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2002.00053.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  13 in total

1.  Impact of the 5As Team study on clinical practice in primary care obesity management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jodie Asselin; Eniola Salami; Adedayo M Osunlana; Ayodele A Ogunleye; Andrew Cave; Jeffrey A Johnson; Arya M Sharma; Denise L Campbell-Scherer
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Is primary care practice equipped to deal with obesity?: comment on "Preventing weight gain by lifestyle intervention in a general practice setting".

Authors:  Debra Haire-Joshu; Samuel Klein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-28

Review 3.  Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Katherine Deane; Heather O Dickinson; Sara Kirk; Hugh Alberti; Fiona R Beyer; James G Brown; Tarra L Penney; Carolyn D Summerbell; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  Impact of obesity and knee osteoarthritis on morbidity and mortality in older Americans.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Rochelle P Walensky; William M Reichmann; Holly L Holt; Hanna Gerlovin; Daniel H Solomon; Joanne M Jordan; David J Hunter; Lisa G Suter; Alexander M Weinstein; A David Paltiel; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Translational research--implementation of NHLBI Obesity Guidelines in a primary care community setting: the Physician Obesity Awareness Project.

Authors:  R J Schuster; J Tasosa; N A Terwoord
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  The centre for healthy weights--shapedown BC: a family-centered, multidisciplinary program that reduces weight gain in obese children over the short-term.

Authors:  Constadina Panagiotopoulos; Rebecca Ronsley; Mohammed Al-Dubayee; Rollin Brant; Boris Kuzeljevic; Erin Rurak; Arlene Cristall; Glynis Marks; Penny Sneddon; Mary Hinchliffe; Jean-Pierre Chanoine; Louise C Mâsse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends.

Authors:  James T Tufano; Bryant T Karras
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  A randomised trial of an Internet weight control resource: the UK Weight Control Trial [ISRCTN58621669].

Authors:  Sara F L Kirk; Emma L Harvey; Aine McConnon; Jennie E Pollard; Darren C Greenwood; James D Thomas; Joan K Ransley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The Role of Health Systems in Obesity Management and Prevention: Problems and Paradigm Shifts.

Authors:  Sara F L Kirk; Tarra L Penney
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2013-09-07

10.  Missing an opportunity: the embedded nature of weight management in primary care.

Authors:  J Asselin; A M Osunlana; A A Ogunleye; A M Sharma; D Campbell-Scherer
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.