Literature DB >> 12119587

[Socio-economic differences in the utilisation of screening programmes and health promotion measures in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany].

M Richter1, H Brand, G Rössler.   

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of socio-economic status on the utilisation of screening programmes and health promotion measures, based on data of a representative health survey in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany), with a sample of 1,920 respondents. The analysis focuses especially on the utilisation of the cancer screening programme and the 'Health Check-Up' programme, which both have a high rank in German secondary prevention strategies. During the study year and the year before 29.2 % of the relevant male and 56.5 % of the female population took part in cancer screening programmes. At the same time 29.6 % of the males and 30.1 % of the females took part in the 'Health Check-Up' programme. In respect of socio-economic differences, the data confirmed the results of former studies in which non-participation of cancer screening programmes increased with decreasing social class. The social gradient was more pronounced with women than with men. While for the 'Health Check-Up' no socio-economic differences could be found, the participation rates in health promotion measures for women varied significantly with socio-economic status. For both screening programmes generally weaker statistical associations were found if the socio-economic status index was substituted by the educational level of the respondents. The findings suggest that strategies designed to increase participation of such programmes should concentrate more on lower social status persons to prevent the development of inequalities in health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12119587     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  7 in total

1.  [Population-related and individual prevention. Strategies and effectiveness].

Authors:  U Walter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Prognostic value of haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose for incident diabetes and implications for screening.

Authors:  Ben Schöttker; Elke Raum; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Heiko Müller; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Social status and participation in health checks in men and women in Germany: results from the German Health Update (GEDA), 2009 and 2010.

Authors:  Jens Hoebel; Matthias Richter; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Determinants of health check attendance in adults: findings from the cross-sectional German Health Update (GEDA) study.

Authors:  Jens Hoebel; Anne Starker; Susanne Jordan; Matthias Richter; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Lena Lueckmann; Jens Hoebel; Julia Roick; Jenny Markert; Jacob Spallek; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Matthias Richter
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  The influence of social determinants on the use of prevention and health promotion services: Results of a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christian Janßen; Stefanie Sauter; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2012-10-25

7.  Is there an association between spatial accessibility of outpatient care and utilization? Analysis of gynecological and general care.

Authors:  Ulrike Stentzel; Jeanette Bahr; Daniel Fredrich; Jens Piegsa; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.