Literature DB >> 12119256

Decompression-triggered positive-pressure ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves pulmonary gas exchange and oxygen uptake.

Axel Kleinsasser1, Karl H Lindner, Andreas Schaefer, Alexander Loeckinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) is the "gold standard" of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is increasingly discussed as an alternative. This study investigated hemodynamics and pulmonary gas exchange applying CPAP enhanced with pressure support ventilation (CPAP(PSV)) during CPR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-four pigs were subjected to ventricular fibrillation and CPR with CPAP(PSV), CPAP, or IPPV. Measurements were taken before (hemodynamics, blood gases, inert gas measurements) and 10 (hemodynamics, blood gases) and 20 (hemodynamics, blood gases, inert gas measurements) minutes after induction of ventricular fibrillation. Although no significant intergroup differences in hemodynamics were found, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) was significantly higher during CPAP(PSV) compared with CPAP or IPPV (98+/-10, 61+/-27, and 71+/-30 mm Hg, respectively, P<0.05). CPAP(PSV) resulted in an alveolar-arterial partial pressure of oxygen difference of 56+/-17 mm Hg, whereas during CPAP, 83+/-21 mm Hg was detected, and during IPPV, 98+/-29 mm Hg was detected (P<0.05). Pulmonary blood flow to lung units with a normal VA/Q ratio in percent of cardiac output was 76+/-17% during CPAP(PSV), 61+/-21% during CPAP (P<0.01), and 54+/-13% during IPPV (P<0.01). Oxygen uptake (VO(2)) was significantly higher during CPAP(PSV) than with the other ventilation modes (P<0.05) and comparable to the baseline value in intragroup comparison. Return of spontaneous circulation was recorded in 8 of 8 animals in the CPAP(PSV) group, in 6 of 8 in the CPAP group, and in 3 of 8 in the IPPV group.
CONCLUSIONS: CPAP(PSV) provides a straightforward and effective alternative to IPPV or CPAP during CPR that provides significantly higher PaO(2) and VO(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12119256     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000021428.94652.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  4 in total

1.  Passive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized cross-over manikin simulation study.

Authors:  Bernd E Winkler; Ralf M Muellenbach; Thomas Wurmb; Manuel F Struck; Norbert Roewer; Peter Kranke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  ["Topless" cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fashion or science?].

Authors:  K Markstaller; B Eberle; W F Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.

Authors:  Clemens Kill; Monika Galbas; Christian Neuhaus; Oliver Hahn; Pascal Wallot; Karl Kesper; Hinnerk Wulf; Wolfgang Dersch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of different inspiratory triggering settings in automated ventilators during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Dingyu Tan; Jun Xu; Shihuan Shao; Yangyang Fu; Feng Sun; Yazhi Zhang; Yingying Hu; Joseph Walline; Huadong Zhu; Xuezhong Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.