Literature DB >> 12118803

Analysis of valve motion after the reimplantation type of valve-sparing procedure (David I) with a new aortic root conduit.

Ruggero De Paulis1, Giovanni Maria De Matteis, Paolo Nardi, Raffaele Scaffa, Carlo Bassano, Luigi Chiariello.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reimplantation type of valve-sparing procedure does not allow proper reconstruction of the sinuses of Valsalva. We assessed the valve motion after a reimplantation type (David I) of valve-sparing procedure using a new Dacron conduit that incorporates sinuses of Valsalva.
METHODS: Nine consecutive patients undergoing an aortic valve-sparing procedure using the new conduit were studied using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography shortly (2 +/- 1 months) after operation to determine root distensibility, expressed as percent change in radius and as pressure strain of the elastic modulus. Next, monodimensional view was used to assess valve motion in its various phases (rapid valve opening velocity, slow closing leaflet displacement, rapid valve closing velocity, maximal leaflet displacement, and leaflet displacement before valve closure). Seven healthy individuals served as control subjects.
RESULTS: Root distensibility was reduced at the level of the annulus and sinotubular junction but was similar to control subjects at the level of the sinuses (percent change in radius, 4.1% +/- 0.8% versus 4.5% +/- 1.2%; pressure strain of the elastic modulus, 1,286 +/- 674 g/cm2 versus 1,195 +/- 628 g/cm2). Rapid valve opening (69 +/- 34.4 cm/s versus 51 +/- 11.9 cm/s) and closing (47.6 +/- 16 cm/s versus 36.4 +/- 9 cm/s) velocity as well as slow closing leaflet displacement (24% +/- 4.7% versus 22.1% +/- 7.9%), maximal leaflet displacement (20.1 +/- 4 mm versus 22.7 +/- 1.9 mm), and leaflet displacement before valve closure (15.2 +/- 3 mm versus 17.6 +/- 0.8 mm) were similar to control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The new aortic root conduit used in a reimplantation type of valve-sparing procedure allows the anatomic reconstruction of the aortic root with leaflet motion similar to that of normal subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118803     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03583-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-09-17

2.  4D flow characterization of aortic blood flow after valve sparing root reimplantation procedure.

Authors:  Nicola Galea; Filippo Piatti; Christopher Lau; Francesco Sturla; Luca Weltert; Iacopo Carbone; Ruggero De Paulis; Mario Gaudino; Leonard N Girardi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-09

3.  Quantitative analysis of 3-dimensional aortic annular geometry: implication for aortic root reimplantation.

Authors:  Liam P Ryan; Melissa M Levack; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Rita C Milewski; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.439

Review 4.  Old Myths, New Concerns: the Long-Term Effects of Ascending Aorta Replacement with Dacron Grafts. Not All That Glitters Is Gold.

Authors:  Cristiano Spadaccio; Francesco Nappi; Nawwar Al-Attar; Fraser W Sutherland; Christophe Acar; Antonio Nenna; Marcella Trombetta; Massimo Chello; Alberto Rainer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Influence on fluid dynamics of coronary artery outlet angle variation in artificial aortic root prosthesis.

Authors:  Janko F Verhey; Christoph Bara
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.