OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment with enrofloxacin and doxycycline with no treatment in cats experimentally infected with Haemobartonella felis. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. ANIMALS: 16 cats. PROCEDURE: Cats were inoculated with large-form H. felis from a chronically infected donor. Cats were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: doxycycline (5 mg/kg [2.3 mg/lb], p.o., q 12 h), low-dose enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg, p.o., q 24 h), high-dose enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg [4.5 mg/lb], p.o., q 24 h), and an untreated control group. Clinical signs, Hct, blood smears, and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay were used to monitor progression of the infection. RESULTS: All cats were confirmed to be infected with H. felis via blood smear evaluations and PCR assay results. Treatment had no effect on Hct during the intratreatment period, but Hct values were significantly greater in the low-dose enrofloxacin group, compared with the control group, during the posttreatment period. During the intratreatment period, H. felis organism counts per 1,000 RBC in the doxycycline treatment and the high-dose enrofloxacin treatment groups decreased at a significantly faster rate than those in the control group. In the posttreatment period, organism counts in the doxycycline treatment group and the low- and high-dose enrofloxacin groups decreased at significantly faster rates than counts in the control group. There was no significant effect of treatment on the number of positive PCR assay results. Two cats treated with enrofloxacin and 1 cat treated with doxycycline completely cleared the H. fe is organism despite presumed immunosuppression caused by glucocorticoids. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results support the hypothesis that enrofloxacin has anti-H. felis effects.
OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment with enrofloxacin and doxycycline with no treatment in cats experimentally infected with Haemobartonella felis. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. ANIMALS: 16 cats. PROCEDURE: Cats were inoculated with large-form H. felis from a chronically infected donor. Cats were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: doxycycline (5 mg/kg [2.3 mg/lb], p.o., q 12 h), low-dose enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg, p.o., q 24 h), high-dose enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg [4.5 mg/lb], p.o., q 24 h), and an untreated control group. Clinical signs, Hct, blood smears, and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay were used to monitor progression of the infection. RESULTS: All cats were confirmed to be infected with H. felis via blood smear evaluations and PCR assay results. Treatment had no effect on Hct during the intratreatment period, but Hct values were significantly greater in the low-dose enrofloxacin group, compared with the control group, during the posttreatment period. During the intratreatment period, H. felis organism counts per 1,000 RBC in the doxycycline treatment and the high-dose enrofloxacin treatment groups decreased at a significantly faster rate than those in the control group. In the posttreatment period, organism counts in the doxycycline treatment group and the low- and high-dose enrofloxacin groups decreased at significantly faster rates than counts in the control group. There was no significant effect of treatment on the number of positive PCR assay results. Two cats treated with enrofloxacin and 1 cat treated with doxycycline completely cleared the H. fe is organism despite presumed immunosuppression caused by glucocorticoids. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results support the hypothesis that enrofloxacin has anti-H. felis effects.
Authors: Marilisa Novacco; Felicitas S Boretti; Godelind A Wolf-Jäckel; Barbara Riond; Marina L Meli; Barbara Willi; Hans Lutz; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann Journal: Vet Res Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 3.683
Authors: Iain R Peters; Chris R Helps; Barbara Willi; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Timothy J Gruffydd-Jones; Michael J Day; Séverine Tasker Journal: Microb Pathog Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Chelsea A E Hicks; Barbara Willi; Barbara Riond; Marilisa Novacco; Marina L Meli; Christopher R Stokes; Christopher R Helps; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Séverine Tasker Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2014-11-19
Authors: Sarah Sugiarto; Andrea M Spiri; Barbara Riond; Marilisa Novacco; Angelina Oestmann; Luisa H Monteiro de Miranda; Marina L Meli; Felicitas S Boretti; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Barbara Willi Journal: Vet Res Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 3.683