Literature DB >> 12118549

The field-matching problem as it applies to the peacock three dimensional conformal system for intensity modulation.

M Carol1, W H Grant, A R Bleier, A A Kania, H S Targovnik, E B Butler, S W Woo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated beam systems have been developed as a means of creating a high-dose region that closely conforms to the prescribed target volume while also providing specific sparing of organs at risk within complex treatment geometries. The slice-by-slice treatment paradigm used by one such system for delivering intensity modulated fields introduces regions of dose nonuniformity where each pair of treatment slices abut. A study was designed to evaluate whether or not the magnitude of the nonuniformity that results from this segmental delivery paradigm is significant relative to the overall dose nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation technique itself. An assessment was also made as to the increase in nonuniformity that would result if errors were made in indexing during treatment delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were generated to simulate correctly indexed and incorrectly indexed treatments of 4, 10, and 18 cm diameter targets. Indexing errors of from 0.1 to 2.0 mm were studied. Treatment plans were also generated for targets of the same diameter but of lengths that did not require indexing of the treatment couch.
RESULTS: The nonuniformity that results from the intensity modulation delivery paradigm is 11-16% for targets where indexing is not required. Correct indexing of the couch adds an additional 1-2% in nonuniformity. However, a couch indexing error of as little as 1 mm can increase the total nonuniformity to as much as 25%. All increases in nonuniformity from indexing are essentially independent of target diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The dose nonuniformity introduced by the segmental strip delivery paradigm is small relative to the nonuniformity present in the intensity modulation paradigm itself. A positioning accuracy of better than 0.5 mm appears to be required when implementing segmental intensity modulated treatment plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 12118549     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  [Inverse radiotherapy planning].

Authors:  W Schlegel; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Clinical effect of multileaf collimator width on the incidence of late rectal bleeding after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Haruo Inokuchi; Takashi Mizowaki; Yoshiki Norihisa; Kenji Takayama; Itaru Ikeda; Kiyonao Nakamura; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Medical physics practice in the next decade.

Authors:  Bhudatt Paliwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-07

4.  Applying the equivalent uniform dose formulation based on the linear-quadratic model to inhomogeneous tumor dose distributions: Caution for analyzing and reporting.

Authors:  J E McGary; W Grant; S Y Woo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.