Literature DB >> 12118342

Misrepair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and its relevance for tumorigenesis and cancer treatment (review).

Kai Rothkamm1, Markus Löbrich.   

Abstract

The faithful repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is probably one of the most critical tasks for a cell in order to maintain its genomic integrity since these lesions may lead to chromosome breaks or rearrangements, mutations, cell death or cancer. DSBs can arise spontaneously during normal cellular DNA metabolism or may be induced by exogenous agents such as ionizing radiation. To overcome the danger that emanates from these lesions, eukaryotic cells have evolved specific pathways for processing DSBs by either homology-dependent or non-homologous repair mechanisms. This review focuses on the formation of genomic rearrangements that arise by joining incorrect break ends and on the factors that influence repair fidelity. Recent studies indicate that the probability for a break to be incorrectly rejoined is fairly low when DSBs are spatially separated but increases drastically when multiple breaks coincide. The formation of genomic rearrangements in situations of multiple breaks is mediated by non-homologous end-joining, the predominant DSB repair pathway in mammalian cells. Interestingly, the same pathway is required for efficiently preserving chromosomal integrity in situations of separated breaks. Furthermore, the probability for a DSB to be faithfully repaired depends on its genomic location and on the cell cycle position. Methods for assaying DSB repair are discussed, again with emphasis on experimental systems that allow to determine whether a DSB is correctly or incorrectly rejoined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  21 in total

1.  Replication forks stalled at ultraviolet lesions are rescued via RecA and RuvABC protein-catalyzed disintegration in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sharik R Khan; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The effect of gap length on double-strand break repair in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dena M Johnson-Schlitz; William R Engels
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Structure of the Rad50 DNA double-strand break repair protein in complex with DNA.

Authors:  Anna Rojowska; Katja Lammens; Florian U Seifert; Carolin Direnberger; Heidi Feldmann; Karl-Peter Hopfner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Novel treatment planning approaches to enhance the therapeutic ratio: targeting the molecular mechanisms of radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Protopapa; V Kouloulias; A Kougioumtzopoulou; Z Liakouli; C Papadimitriou; A Zygogianni
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  X-irradiation-induced cell cycle delay and DNA double-strand breaks in the murine osteoblastic cell line OCT-1.

Authors:  Patrick Lau; Christa Baumstark-Khan; Christine E Hellweg; Günther Reitz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Replication fork inhibition in seqA mutants of Escherichia coli triggers replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ella Rotman; Sharik R Khan; Elena Kouzminova; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Single-dose radiotherapy disables tumor cell homologous recombination via ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Sahra Bodo; Cécile Campagne; Tin Htwe Thin; Daniel S Higginson; H Alberto Vargas; Guoqiang Hua; John D Fuller; Ellen Ackerstaff; James Russell; Zhigang Zhang; Stefan Klingler; HyungJoon Cho; Matthew G Kaag; Yousef Mazaheri; Andreas Rimner; Katia Manova-Todorova; Boris Epel; Joan Zatcky; Cristian R Cleary; Shyam S Rao; Yoshiya Yamada; Michael J Zelefsky; Howard J Halpern; Jason A Koutcher; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Carlo Greco; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Evis Sala; Simon N Powell; Richard Kolesnick; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Authors:  K Rothkamm; C Beinke; H Romm; C Badie; Y Balagurunathan; S Barnard; N Bernard; H Boulay-Greene; M Brengues; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; R Greither; F Herodin; A Jones; S Kabacik; T Knie; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; A Missel; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; U Roessler; H Scherthan; B Terbrueggen; H Thierens; M Valente; A Vral; F Zenhausern; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Childhood Cancer: Occurrence, Treatment and Risk of Second Primary Malignancies.

Authors:  Sebastian Zahnreich; Heinz Schmidberger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.