Literature DB >> 12117155

Paying for national health insurance--and not getting it.

Steffie Woolhandler1, David U Himmelstein.   

Abstract

The threat of steep tax hikes has torpedoed the debate over national health insurance. Yet according to our calculations, the current tax-financed share of health spending is far higher than most people think: 59.8 percent. This figure (which is about fifteen percentage points higher than the official Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] estimate) includes health care-related tax subsidies and public employees' health benefits, neither of which are classified as public expenditures in the CMS accounting framework. U.S. tax-financed health spending is now the highest in the world. Indeed, our tax-financed costs exceed total costs in every nation except Switzerland. But the sub rosa character of much tax-financed health spending in the United States obscures its regressivity. Public spending for care of the poor, elderly, and disabled is hotly debated and intensely scrutinized. But tax subsidies that accrue mostly to the affluent and health benefits for middle-class government workers are mostly below the radar screen. National health insurance would require smaller tax increases than most people imagine and would make government's role in financing care more visible and explicit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12117155     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  10 in total

1.  National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high, or at our feet?

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The high costs of for-profit care.

Authors:  Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Current and Projected Taxpayer Shares of US Health Costs.

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Old bones, new data: emmett Hall, private insurance and the defeat of pharmacare.

Authors:  Robert G Evans
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-02

5.  National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high, or at our feet?

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Lifetime Economic Burden of Rape Among U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Sarah DeGue; Curtis Florence; Colby N Lokey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  A better idea for United States health care--the balanced choice proposal.

Authors:  Stephen B Kemble
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2010-12

8.  Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Megan C Kearns; Wendy LiKamWa McIntosh; Lianne Fuino Estefan; Christina Nicolaidis; Kathryn E McCollister; Amy Gordon; Curtis Florence
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Provider payment in community-based health insurance schemes in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Jacob Robyn; Rainer Sauerborn; Till Bärnighausen
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.344

10.  A national health insurance program for the United States.

Authors:  Don R McCanne
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.