Literature DB >> 12117129

Patients in conflict with managed care: a profile of appeals in two HMOs.

Carole Roan Gresenz1, David M Studdert, Nancy Campbell, Deborah R Hensler.   

Abstract

Despite speculation about the nature of disputes between managed care enrollees and their health plans over benefit denials, little empirical information exists about the details of such disputes and how they are actually handled. In this study we profile more than 11,000 appeals lodged between 1998 and 2000 by enrollees at two of the nation's largest health maintenance organizations (HMOs), to shed some preliminary light on the vast terrain of enrollee appeals. As many as half of appeals involved requests for reimbursement for costs of services already obtained ("retrospective" appeals), as opposed to services sought ("prospective appeals"). Enrollees won 36 percent of prospective appeals at Plan 1 and 70 percent at Plan 2, compared with 89 percent and 78 percent, respectively, of retrospective appeals. The success rate among retrospective appeals involving emergency room services--95 percent at both plans--was particularly striking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12117129     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  2 in total

1.  Voices unheard: barriers to expressing dissatisfaction to health plans.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Shannon Mitchell; Brian Elbel
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Cost reduction strategies for emergency services: insurance role, practice changes and patients accountability.

Authors:  Daniel Simonet
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.