Literature DB >> 12116937

Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility.

F R O'Keefe1, P J Wagner.   

Abstract

The notion that two characters evolve independently is of interest for two reasons. First, theories of biological integration often predict that change in one character requires complementary change in another. Second, character independence is a basic assumption of most phylogenetic inference methods, and dependent characters might confound attempts at phylogenetic inference. Previously proposed tests of correlated character evolution require a model phylogeny and therefore assume that nonphylogenetic correlation has a negligible effect on initial tree construction. This paper develops "tree-free" methods for testing the independence of cladistic characters. These methods can test the character independence model as a hypothesis before phylogeny reconstruction, or can be used simply to test for correlated evolution. We first develop an approach for visualizing suites of correlated characters by using character compatibility. Two characters are compatible if they can be used to construct a tree without homoplasy. The approach is based on the examination of mutual compatibilities between characters. The number of times two characters i and j share compatibility with a third character is calculated, and a pairwise shared compatibility matrix is constructed. From this matrix, an association matrix analogous to a dissimilarity matrix is derived. Eigenvector analyses of this association matrix reveal suites of characters with similar compatibility patterns. A priori character subsets can be tested for significant correlation on these axes. Monte Carlo tests are performed to determine the expected distribution of mutual compatibilities, given various criteria from the original data set. These simulated distributions are then used to test whether the observed amounts of nonphylogenetic correlation in character suites can be attributed to chance alone. We have applied these methods to published morphological data for caecilian amphibians. The analyses corroborate instances of dependent evolution hypothesized by previous workers and also identify novel partitions. Phylogenetic analysis is performed after reducing correlated suites to single characters. The resulting cladogram has greater topological resolution and implies appreciably less change among the remaining characters than does a tree derived from the raw data matrix.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12116937     DOI: 10.1080/106351501753328794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  13 in total

1.  The morphological state space revisited: what do phylogenetic patterns in homoplasy tell us about the number of possible character states?

Authors:  Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Application of the character compatibility approach to generalized molecular sequence data: branching order of the proteobacterial subdivisions.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta; Peter H A Sneath
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Modelling rate distributions using character compatibility: implications for morphological evolution among fossil invertebrates.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Trait-based diversification shifts reflect differential extinction among fossil taxa.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner; George F Estabrook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Early bursts of disparity and the reorganization of character integration.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Replaying evolutionary transitions from the dental fossil record.

Authors:  Enni Harjunmaa; Kerstin Seidel; Teemu Häkkinen; Elodie Renvoisé; Ian J Corfe; Aki Kallonen; Zhao-Qun Zhang; Alistair R Evans; Marja L Mikkola; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; Ophir D Klein; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dental Data Perform Relatively Poorly in Reconstructing Mammal Phylogenies: Morphological Partitions Evaluated with Molecular Benchmarks.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom; Matthew Albion Wills; Tamara Williams
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.160

8.  Concatabominations: identifying unstable taxa in morphological phylogenetics using a heuristic extension to safe taxonomic reduction.

Authors:  Karen Siu-Ting; Davide Pisani; Christopher J Creevey; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  On the relationship between the macroevolutionary trajectories of morphological integration and morphological disparity.

Authors:  Sylvain Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.

Authors:  A Goswami; J B Smaers; C Soligo; P D Polly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.