Literature DB >> 12116814

[Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].

Alessandro Carunchio1, Maurizio Burattini, Claudio Coletta, Luciano Pandolfo, Andrea Porzio, Fabrizio Zecchini, Vincenzo Ceci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of biphasic shock for atrial fibrillation cardioversion to sinus rhythm. A second endpoint was to evaluate myocardial damage by means of cardiac troponin I dosage.
METHODS: We studied 164 patients, with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (208 episodes). Group A patients underwent biphasic shock normalized with respect to weight: 50 J (weight < 60 kg), 70 J (weight 61-84 kg) and 100 J (weight > 84 kg; the second and third shocks were 2 and 3 times higher than the first. Group B underwent sequential monophasic shock of 200, 300 and 360 J. Troponin I was evaluated at baseline, and 6, 12 and 24 hours after cardioversion.
RESULTS: Total efficacy was 92% for biphasic shock and 89% for monophasic shock. First-shock efficacy with biphasic waveform (57.3%) was significantly greater than with first monophasic waveform (21.5%) (p = 0.000). Cardiac troponin I increased from 0.4 +/- 1.1 to 0.8 +/- 2.2 compared to a normal value of 2 ng/ml.
CONCLUSIONS: For transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, biphasic shock has a greater efficacy requiring less energy compared to monophasic shock. Normal mean values of cardiac troponin I proved the absence of myocardial damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12116814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital Heart J Suppl        ISSN: 1129-4728


  1 in total

1.  Importance of using biphasic shock waveforms for cardioversion from atrial fibrillation: an unresolved issue.

Authors:  J M Morgan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.