BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FCET) is an efficient method to map associations between biomolecules because of its high sensitivity to changes in molecular distances in the range of 1-10 nm. However, the requirement for a dual-laser instrument and the need for a relatively high signal-to-noise system (i.e., high expression level of the molecules) pose limitations to a wide application of the method. METHODS: Antibodies conjugated to cyanines 3 and 5 (Cy3 and Cy5) were used to label membrane proteins on the cell surface. FCET measurements were made on a widely used benchtop dual-laser flow cytometer, the FACSCalibur, by using cell-by-cell analysis of energy transfer efficiency.ResultsTo increase the accuracy of FCET measurements, we applied a long wavelength donor-acceptor pair, Cy3 and Cy5, which beneficially affected the signal-to-noise ratio in comparison with the classic pair of fluorescein and rhodamine. A new algorithm for cell-by-cell correction of autofluorescence further improved the sensitivity of the technique; cell subpopulations with only slightly different FCET efficiencies could be identified. The new FCET technique was tested on various direct and indirect immunofluorescent labeling strategies. The highest FCET values could be measured when applying direct labeling on both (donor and acceptor) sides. Upon increasing the complexity of the labeling scheme by introducing secondary antibodies, we detected a decrease in the energy transfer efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new FCET protocol by applying long wavelength excitation and detection of fluorescence and by refining autofluorescence correction. The increased accuracy of the new method makes cells with low receptor expression amenable to FCET investigation, and the new approach can be implemented easily on a commercially available dual-laser flow cytometer, such as a FACSCalibur. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FCET) is an efficient method to map associations between biomolecules because of its high sensitivity to changes in molecular distances in the range of 1-10 nm. However, the requirement for a dual-laser instrument and the need for a relatively high signal-to-noise system (i.e., high expression level of the molecules) pose limitations to a wide application of the method. METHODS: Antibodies conjugated to cyanines 3 and 5 (Cy3 and Cy5) were used to label membrane proteins on the cell surface. FCET measurements were made on a widely used benchtop dual-laser flow cytometer, the FACSCalibur, by using cell-by-cell analysis of energy transfer efficiency.ResultsTo increase the accuracy of FCET measurements, we applied a long wavelength donor-acceptor pair, Cy3 and Cy5, which beneficially affected the signal-to-noise ratio in comparison with the classic pair of fluorescein and rhodamine. A new algorithm for cell-by-cell correction of autofluorescence further improved the sensitivity of the technique; cell subpopulations with only slightly different FCET efficiencies could be identified. The new FCET technique was tested on various direct and indirect immunofluorescent labeling strategies. The highest FCET values could be measured when applying direct labeling on both (donor and acceptor) sides. Upon increasing the complexity of the labeling scheme by introducing secondary antibodies, we detected a decrease in the energy transfer efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new FCET protocol by applying long wavelength excitation and detection of fluorescence and by refining autofluorescence correction. The increased accuracy of the new method makes cells with low receptor expression amenable to FCET investigation, and the new approach can be implemented easily on a commercially available dual-laser flow cytometer, such as a FACSCalibur. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Gábor Mocsár; Julianna Volkó; Daniel Rönnlund; Jerker Widengren; Péter Nagy; János Szöllősi; Katalin Tóth; Carolyn K Goldman; Sándor Damjanovich; Thomas A Waldmann; Andrea Bodnár; György Vámosi Journal: Biophys J Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Enikő Nizsalóczki; István Csomós; Péter Nagy; Zsolt Fazekas; Carolyn K Goldman; Thomas A Waldmann; Sándor Damjanovich; György Vámosi; László Mátyus; Andrea Bodnár Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Éva Nagy; Gábor Mocsár; Veronika Sebestyén; Julianna Volkó; Ferenc Papp; Katalin Tóth; Sándor Damjanovich; György Panyi; Thomas A Waldmann; Andrea Bodnár; György Vámosi Journal: Biophys J Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Malte Renz; Brian R Daniels; György Vámosi; Irwin M Arias; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Miklós Petrás; Tamás Lajtos; Elza Friedländer; Almos Klekner; Eva Pintye; Burt G Feuerstein; János Szöllosi; György Vereb Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: György Vámosi; Andrea Bodnár; György Vereb; Attila Jenei; Carolyn K Goldman; Jörg Langowski; Katalin Tóth; László Mátyus; János Szöllösi; Thomas A Waldmann; Sándor Damjanovich Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G J J Kierkels; W Scheper; A D Meringa; I Johanna; D X Beringer; A Janssen; M Schiffler; T Aarts-Riemens; L Kramer; T Straetemans; S Heijhuurs; J H W Leusen; E San José; K Fuchs; M Griffioen; J H Falkenburg; L Bongiovanni; A de Bruin; D Vargas-Diaz; M Altelaar; A J R Heck; L D Shultz; F Ishikawa; M I Nishimura; Z Sebestyén; J Kuball Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-10-08