Literature DB >> 12116333

Laser-tattoo removal--a study of the mechanism and the optimal treatment strategy via computer simulations.

Darwin D-M Ho1, Richard London, George B Zimmerman, David A Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The physical mechanisms for laser-tattoo interactions and the tattoo particle breakup process are not well understood. This study investigates whether the mechanism of the breakup process can be identified via computer simulations and proposes a treatment strategy that can potentially minimize the collateral damage to the surrounding tissues. Note that the "removal" of tattoo particles is defined here as breakup of particles into smaller ones with sizes approaching or smaller than the visible wavelength of light so that they become less visible. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiation-hydrodynamics code LATIS is used for the modeling. We first identify the magnitude of the tensile stress generated inside graphite tattoo particles as functions of laser pulse length and particle size. We then calculate the relationship between the surface laser fluence (defined as the time integrated energy flux) and the tensile strength of the tattoo particle at a given depth.
RESULTS: If the laser pulse length is sufficiently short, strong acoustic waves with tensile strengths exceeding the fracture thresholds for graphite are generated. The strength of the wave decreases with particle size and increases as the laser pulse length decreases. Simulation results are in general agreement with clinical studies. Although temperatures of the tattoo particles never reach the melting point, a cavitation bubble around the particle can be formed. The steam generated can get into the cracked particles and induce steam-carbon reactions. Laser energy density decreases rapidly with the skin depth. Therefore, the minimum surface laser fluence, for a given pulse length, required for breaking up tattoo particles at a given skin depth, increases with particle depth.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer simulations confirm that the breakup of tattoo particles is photoacoustic. For the same amount of laser energy, a shorter pulse is more efficient. The optimal pulse length is approximately 10-100 picosecond to minimize the laser fluence and the collateral damage. It is more difficult to break up the smallest tattoo particles that have diameters smaller than 10 nm; however, smaller particles are less important because they are less visible. Tissue surrounding the tattoo particles can be damaged by cavitation bubbles. These bubbles could be the cause of the empty vacuoles in the ash-white lesions throughout the dermis seen after treatment. Steam-carbon reactions can be induced. Particles then become grossly transparent because of this reaction. Different laser intensity should be used for pigments at different depths in order to minimize the collateral damage to the dermis. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12116333     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.10065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  22 in total

Review 1.  Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.

Authors:  Sonal Choudhary; Mohamed L Elsaie; Angel Leiva; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.

Authors:  W Bäumler; K T Weiß
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Determination of the thermal and physical properties of black tattoo ink using compound analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Humphries; Tom S Lister; Philip A Wright; Michael P Hughes
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Treatment of flat and elevated pigmented disorders with a 755-nm alexandrite picosecond laser: clinical and histological evaluation.

Authors:  Adrian Alegre-Sanchez; Natalia Jiménez-Gómez; Óscar M Moreno-Arrones; Pablo Fonda-Pascual; Bibiana Pérez-García; Pedro Jaén-Olasolo; Pablo Boixeda
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  The picosecond laser for tattoo removal.

Authors:  Vincent M Hsu; Adam S Aldahan; Stephanie Mlacker; Vidhi V Shah; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Noninvasive two-photon optical biopsy of retinal fluorophores.

Authors:  Grazyna Palczewska; Jakub Boguslawski; Patrycjusz Stremplewski; Lukasz Kornaszewski; Jianye Zhang; Zhiqian Dong; Xiao-Xuan Liang; Enrico Gratton; Alfred Vogel; Maciej Wojtkowski; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of Q-switched and picosecond lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie M Williams; Pooja Gurnani; Jun Long; John Reynolds; Yue Pan; Takahiro Suzuki; Ghadah I Alhetheli; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Visualization of laser tattoo removal treatment effects in a mouse model by two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Jang; Yeoreum Yoon; Wonjoong Kim; Soonjae Kwon; Seunghun Lee; Duke Song; Jong Woon Choi; Ki Hean Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Potential of sub-microsecond laser pulse shaping for controlling microcavitation in selective retinal therapies.

Authors:  Pascal Deladurantaye; Sébastien Méthot; Ozzy Mermut; Pierre Galarneau; Patrick J Rochette
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 10.  Medical Complications of Tattoos: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Parvez S Islam; Christopher Chang; Carlo Selmi; Elena Generali; Arthur Huntley; Suzanne S Teuber; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 8.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.