Literature DB >> 12116317

Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of alpha- and beta-thalassaemias in Hong Kong.

Pui Wah Hui1, Yung Hang Lam, Min Chen, Mary Hoi Yin Tang, William Shu Biu Yeung, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, Pak Chung Ho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was an acceptable alternative to prenatal diagnosis in couples at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population.
METHODS: An information leaflet was distributed to the women at risk. They were asked to complete a questionnaire after having an interview with a designated investigator.
RESULTS: A total of 141 valid questionnaires were analysed; 82.3% of the women considered PGD either the same or better than conventional prenatal diagnosis. Women with an affected child or a subfertility problem were more willing to accept PGD and to undergo this procedure in their future pregnancies. Their main concern about PGD was damage to the embryo during the PGD procedure. The most important perceived advantage of PGD was avoidance of termination of an affected pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: PGD is an acceptable alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis in women at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population. This is particularly true in women with a subfertility problem and in women who already have an affected child. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12116317     DOI: 10.1002/pd.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  8 in total

1.  Attitudes Toward Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Genetic Disorders Among Potential Users in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina Patrick Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Karen Kavanaugh; Ellen Olshansky; Alan Schwartz; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Public perspectives on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  William D Winkelman; Stacey A Missmer; Dale Myers; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  More than 10 years after the first 'savior siblings': parental experiences surrounding preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Margaret L MacMillan; John E Wagner; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A three-year follow-up study evaluating clinical utility of exome sequencing and diagnostic potential of reanalysis.

Authors:  Jasmine L F Fung; Mullin H C Yu; Shushu Huang; Claudia C Y Chung; Marcus C Y Chan; Sander Pajusalu; Christopher C Y Mak; Vivian C C Hui; Mandy H Y Tsang; Kit San Yeung; Monkol Lek; Brian H Y Chung
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 8.617

6.  Acceptable applications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) among Israeli PGD users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; David A Zeevi; Sigal Gooldin; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

8.  Effects of religious orientation and state secularism on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Zira Hichy; Federica Sciacca; Graziella Di Marco; Concetta De Pasquale
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.