Literature DB >> 12115973

Lateral spread response elicited by double stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm.

Shinya Yamashita1, Tadashi Kawaguchi, Masafumi Fukuda, Kenji Suzuki, Masatoshi Watanabe, Ryuichi Tanaka, Shigeki Kameyama.   

Abstract

In patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS), a lateral spread response (or abnormal muscle response) is recorded from facial muscles after facial nerve stimulation. The origin of this response is not completely understood. We studied the lateral spread responses elicited by double stimulation in 12 patients with HFS during microvascular decompression. The response was recorded from the mentalis muscle by electrical stimulation of the temporal branch of the facial nerve or from the orbicularis oculi muscles by stimulation of the marginal mandibular branch. The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of double stimulation ranged from 0.5 to 7.0 ms. R1 was defined as the response elicited by the first stimulus, and R2 as the response elicited by the second stimulus. R1 had a constant latency and amplitude regardless of the ISI, whereas R2 appeared after a fixed refractory period without facilitation or depression in a recovery curve of latency and amplitude. From these findings, we consider that the lateral spread response is due to cross-transmission of facial nerve fibers at the site of vascular compression rather than arising from facial nerve motor neurons. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115973     DOI: 10.1002/mus.10123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  7 in total

1.  The significance of intraoperative electromyographic "lateral spread" in predicting outcome of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Kajetan von Eckardstein; Charles Harper; Marina Castner; Michael Link
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-03-12

2.  The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El Damaty; Christian Rosenstengel; Marc Matthes; Joerg Baldauf; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Early permanent disappearance of abnormal muscle response during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Chengrong Jiang; Wu Xu; Yuxiang Dai; Tianyu Lu; Wei Jin; Weibang Liang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Is the pre-operative lateral spread response on facial electromyography a valid diagnostic tool for hemifacial spasm?

Authors:  Chang Kyu Park; Seung Hoon Lim; Seung Hwan Lee; Bong Jin Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Clinical and electrophysiological studies of botulinum toxin type A to treat hemifacial spasm complicated with auricular symptoms.

Authors:  Bin Peng; Hongjuan Dong; Hong Chu; Shenqi Zhang; Zuneng Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Monitoring of abnormal muscle response and facial motor evoked potential during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Masafumi Fukuda; Makoto Oishi; Tetsuro Takao; Tetsuya Hiraishi; Yosuke Sato; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-13

7.  Compound maximal motor unit response is modulated by contraction intensity, but not contraction type in tibialis anterior.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell; Rade Durbaba; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.