BACKGROUND: The psychological adaptation to a cancer diagnosis is characterized by significant distress. Although distress levels in cancer patients have been reported to be the highest shortly after diagnosis and before treatment, few attempts have been made to study emotional adjustment during the diagnostic period of prostate cancer patients. This study's purpose was to determine whether differences in distress levels can be attributed to differences in diagnostic status, optimism, and/or coping strategies. METHODS: This study followed patients across 4 weeks, from prebiopsy to 2 weeks postdiagnosis, using these two time points as measurements. Data were collected between 1995 and 1998 at the Miami and Palo Alto VA Medical Center urology clinics. Biopsies were performed on 101 men (ages 46-87) to determine whether prostate cancer was present. These men completed prebiopsy and postdiagnosis questionnaires. RESULTS: Of optimism, coping, and cancer status, the only significant predictor of increased distress at postdiagnosis was dispositional avoidance at prebiopsy for both cancer and noncancer groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings complement other studies linking avoidance with increased distress, the similarities between the cancer and noncancer groups underscore the need to consider both of these groups during the first few weeks of the prostate cancer diagnostic process. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The psychological adaptation to a cancer diagnosis is characterized by significant distress. Although distress levels in cancerpatients have been reported to be the highest shortly after diagnosis and before treatment, few attempts have been made to study emotional adjustment during the diagnostic period of prostate cancerpatients. This study's purpose was to determine whether differences in distress levels can be attributed to differences in diagnostic status, optimism, and/or coping strategies. METHODS: This study followed patients across 4 weeks, from prebiopsy to 2 weeks postdiagnosis, using these two time points as measurements. Data were collected between 1995 and 1998 at the Miami and Palo Alto VA Medical Center urology clinics. Biopsies were performed on 101 men (ages 46-87) to determine whether prostate cancer was present. These men completed prebiopsy and postdiagnosis questionnaires. RESULTS: Of optimism, coping, and cancer status, the only significant predictor of increased distress at postdiagnosis was dispositional avoidance at prebiopsy for both cancer and noncancer groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings complement other studies linking avoidance with increased distress, the similarities between the cancer and noncancer groups underscore the need to consider both of these groups during the first few weeks of the prostate cancer diagnostic process. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
Authors: C Börgermann; M Sieverding; P Fornara; M Graefen; P Hammerer; A Semjonow; F Schröder; H Rübben Journal: Urologe A Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Elise L Lev; Lucille Sanzero Eller; John Kolassa; Glen Gejerman; Joan Colella; Patricia Lane; Suzanne Scrofine; Michael Esposito; Vincent Lanteri; John Scheuch; Ravi Munver; Bernadette Galli; Richard A Watson; Ihor Sawczuk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Scott C Roesch; Linda Adams; Amanda Hines; Alan Palmores; Pearlin Vyas; Cindy Tran; Shannon Pekin; Allison A Vaughn Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2005-06
Authors: Kelly Biegler; Lorenzo Cohen; Shellie Scott; Katherine Hitzhusen; Patricia Parker; Chelsea D Gilts; Andrea Canada; Louis Pisters Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Meredith Wallace Kazer; Janet Harden; Matthew Burke; Martin G Sanda; Jill Hardy; Donald E Bailey Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-11-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Patricia A Wren; Nancy K Janz; Mary P FitzGerald; Matthew D Barber; Kathryn L Burgio; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Ingrid E Nygaard; Halina M Zyczynski; Xin Gao Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Dean G Cruess; Catherine Benedict; Emily G Lattie; Ivan Molton; Dave Kinsinger; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan; Mark Soloway; Frank J Penedo Journal: J Pers Assess Date: 2012-05-09