Literature DB >> 12115238

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant methotrexate treatment for giant cell arteritis.

Gary S Hoffman1, Maria C Cid, David B Hellmann, Loic Guillevin, John H Stone, John Schousboe, Pascal Cohen, Leonard H Calabrese, Howard Dickler, Peter A Merkel, Paul Fortin, John A Flynn, Geri A Locker, Kirk A Easley, Eric Schned, Gene G Hunder, Michael C Sneller, Carol Tuggle, Howard Swanson, J Hernández-Rodríguez, Alfons Lopez-Soto, Debora Bork, Diane B Hoffman, Kenneth Kalunian, David Klashman, William S Wilke, Raymond J Scheetz, Brian F Mandell, Barri J Fessler, Gregory Kosmorsky, Richard Prayson, Raashid A Luqmani, George Nuki, Euan McRorie, Yvonne Sherrer, Shawn Baca, Bridgit Walsh, Diane Ferland, Martin Soubrier, Hyon K Choi, Wolfgang Gross, Allen M Segal, Charles Ludivico, Xavier Puechal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis (GCA) to determine if MTX reduces GCA relapses and cumulative corticosteroid (CS) requirements and diminishes disease- and treatment-related morbidity.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Over 4 years, 16 centers from the International Network for the Study of Systemic Vasculitides enrolled patients with unequivocal GCA. The initial treatment was 1 mg/kg/day (<or=60 mg every day) prednisone, plus either 0.15 mg/kg/week MTX (increased to 0.25 mg/kg/week, for a maximum weekly dosage of 15 mg) or placebo. Two physicians, both blinded to treatment allocation, evaluated each patient at every trial visit. One physician was responsible for providing global medical care. The other assessed GCA status according to a standard protocol. Treatment failure was defined as 2 distinct relapses or persistence of disease activity after the first relapse, in spite of increased CS therapy.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. No significant differences between treatment groups were noted with regard to age, frequency of positive findings on temporal artery biopsy (placebo 87%, MTX 79%), or comorbidities at the time of enrollment. The median dosage of MTX was 15 mg/week. The incidence of treatment failure was comparable between groups after 12 months: 57.5% in the MTX group failed treatment (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 41.6-73.4%) compared with 77.3% in the placebo group (95% CI 61.9-92.8%) (P = 0.26). In a Cox regression analysis, MTX was not associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.41-1.28). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to abnormal elevations of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate following initial remissions, serious morbidity due to GCA, cumulative CS dose, or treatment toxicity. In the MTX group, there were fewer cases of GCA relapse heralded by symptoms of isolated polymyalgia rheumatica (1 case versus 5 in the placebo group; P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized, multicenter trial do not support the adjunctive use of MTX to control disease activity or to decrease the cumulative dose and toxicity of CS in patients with GCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115238     DOI: 10.1002/art.10262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  100 in total

Review 1.  [Therapy of primary systemic vasculitis].

Authors:  K de Groot; W L Gross; B Hellmich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J M Calvo-Romero
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Neuro-Ophthalmological Emergencies.

Authors:  João Lemos; Eric Eggenberger
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-10

4.  Disease Relapses among Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tanaz A Kermani; Kenneth J Warrington; David Cuthbertson; Simon Carette; Gary S Hoffman; Nader A Khalidi; Curry L Koening; Carol A Langford; Kathleen Maksimowicz-McKinnon; Carol A McAlear; Paul A Monach; Philip Seo; Peter A Merkel; Steven R Ytterberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Prednisolone combined with adjunctive immunosuppression is not superior to prednisolone alone in terms of efficacy and safety in giant cell arteritis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Yates; Y K Loke; R A Watts; A J MacGregor
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of cerebral vasculitis.

Authors:  Peter Berlit
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 7.  [Polymyalgia rheumatica: myalgic syndrome or occult vasculitis?].

Authors:  B Hellmich; W L Gross
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  EULAR recommendations for conducting clinical studies and/or clinical trials in systemic vasculitis: focus on anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis.

Authors:  Bernhard Hellmich; Oliver Flossmann; Wolfgang L Gross; Paul Bacon; Jan Willem Cohen-Tervaert; Loic Guillevin; David Jayne; Alfred Mahr; Peter A Merkel; Heiner Raspe; David G I Scott; James Witter; Hasan Yazici; Raashid A Luqmani
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Carlos Garcia-Porrua; Jose A Miranda-Filloy; Javier Martin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cristian Labarca; Matthew J Koster; Cynthia S Crowson; Ashima Makol; Steven R Ytterberg; Eric L Matteson; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.