Literature DB >> 12115227

Knee pain reduces joint space width in conventional standing anteroposterior radiographs of osteoarthritic knees.

Steven A Mazzuca1, Kenneth D Brandt, Kathleen A Lane, Barry P Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A suspected, but heretofore undemonstrated, limitation of the conventional weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) knee radiograph, in which the joint is imaged in extension, for studies of progression of osteoarthritis (OA) is that changes in knee pain may affect extension, thereby altering the apparent thickness of the articular cartilage. The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of changes in knee pain of varying magnitudes on radiographic joint space width (JSW) in the weight-bearing extended and the semiflexed AP views, in which radioanatomic positioning of the knee was carefully standardized by fluoroscopy.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with knee OA underwent a washout of their analgesic/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) agents (duration 5 half-lives), after which standing AP and semiflexed AP knee radiographs of both knees were obtained. Examinations were repeated 1-12 weeks later (median 4.5 weeks, mean 6.0 weeks), after resumption of analgesic/NSAID therapy. Knee pain was measured with the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index (Likert scale). JSW was measured with a pair of calipers and a magnifying lens. Mixed model analyses of variance were used to test the significance of changes in pain and JSW within and between 2 groups of knees with mild-to-moderate radiographic severity of OA: (a) "flaring knees," in which the patient rated standing knee pain as severe or extreme after the washout and in which pain decreased to any degree after resumption of analgesics and/or NSAIDs (n = 12) and (b) "nonflaring knees," in which standing knee pain was absent, mild, or moderate after the washout or did not decrease after resumption of treatment (n = 15).
RESULTS: After reinstitution of treatment, WOMAC pain scores decreased significantly in both flaring and nonflaring knees (-44%; P < 0.0001 and -18%; P < 0.01, respectively). After adjustment for the within-subject correlation between knees, mean JSW (+/-SEM) in the extended view of the flaring OA knee increased significantly from the first to second examination (0.20 +/- 0.06 mm; P = 0.005). In contrast, the change in adjusted mean JSW in the extended view of the nonflaring OA knee was negligible (-0.04 +/- 0.04 mm) and significantly smaller than that observed in flaring knees (P < 0.01). Mean JSW in the semiflexed AP view was unaffected by the severity or responsiveness of standing knee pain in flaring and nonflaring OA knees.
CONCLUSION: JSW in weight-bearing extended-view radiographs of highly symptomatic OA knees can be altered significantly by changes in joint pain. In clinical trials and in epidemiologic studies of OA progression that use this radiographic technique, longitudinal variations in pain may confound changes in the apparent thickness of the articular cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115227     DOI: 10.1002/art.10256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  19 in total

1.  Non-surgical treatment of osteoarthritis: a half century of "advances".

Authors:  K D Brandt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  State-of-the-art disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs.

Authors:  Roland W Moskowitz; Michele Hooper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  OARSI-OMERACT definition of relevant radiological progression in hip/knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Ornetti; K Brandt; M-P Hellio-Le Graverand; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; M Kloppenburg; N Lane; J-F Maillefert; S A Mazzuca; T Spector; G Utard-Wlerick; E Vignon; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Reproducibility of joint space width and the intermargin distance measurements in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee in various degrees of flexion.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Norio Yamanaka; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Haruyasu Yamamoto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging.

Authors:  John A Carrino; Abdullah Al Muhit; Wojciech Zbijewski; Gaurav K Thawait; J Webster Stayman; Nathan Packard; Robert Senn; Dong Yang; David H Foos; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Non-invasive MRI assessment of the articular cartilage in clinical studies and experimental settings.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; James F Griffith; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

7.  Risk factors for progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: an analysis based on fluoroscopically standardised knee radiography.

Authors:  S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; B P Katz; Y Ding; K A Lane; K A Buckwalter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  The use of glucosamine therapy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Djamila Zerkak; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2004-12

Review 9.  Exercise and knee osteoarthritis: benefit or hazard?

Authors:  Neil J Bosomworth
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  The use of glucosamine therapy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Djamila Zerkak; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.