Literature DB >> 12114895

Pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study.

Amy L O'Boyle1, Patrick J Woodman, John D O'Boyle, Gary D Davis, Steven E Swift.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women at a single institution. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a case-control study. Pregnant patients and nonpregnant control subjects were matched according to age and race. Subjects underwent pelvic organ support evaluation by use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) examination as part of routine prenatal or gynecologic care. The Pearson chi(2) statistic was used for statistical analysis, with a P value of 5% set for significance.
RESULTS: A total of 21 pregnant and 21 nonpregnant nulliparous women between the ages of 18 and 29 years were included. All patients in the nonpregnant group had a POPQ stage of 0 or 1, whereas 47.6% of the pregnant subjects had POPQ stage 2 (P <.001). Individual components of the POPQ examination were compared. Significant differences were noted for points Aa and Ba, Ap and Bp, and PB and TVL.
CONCLUSIONS: In nulliparous women, pregnancy is associated with increased POPQ stage compared with nonpregnant control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12114895     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.125734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum.

Authors:  Amy L O'Boyle; John D O'Boyle; Byron Calhoun; Gary D Davis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-31

2.  Correlation of pelvic organ prolapse quantification system scores with obstetric parameters and lower urinary tract symptoms in primiparae postpartum.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Liang; Ling-Hong Tseng; Shang-Gwo Horng; I-wen Lin; Shuenn-Dhy Chang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-22

Review 3.  Pelvic organ prolapse: demographics and future growth prospects.

Authors:  Harold P Drutz; May Alarab
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

4.  Is parity in the eye of the beholder?

Authors:  Gunhilde M Buchsbaum; Erin Duecy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

5.  The contractile properties of vaginal myofibroblasts: is the myofibroblasts contraction force test a valuable indication of future prolapse development?

Authors:  S Meyer; C Achtari; P Hohlfeld; L Juillerat-Jeanneret
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-30

6.  Impact of subsequent pregnancies on pelvic floor functional anatomy.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz; Francesco Scoti; Nishamini Subramaniam; Talia Friedman; Ka Lai Shek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?

Authors:  Yuval Lavy; Peter K Sand; Chava I Kaniel; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Karl M Luber
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

9.  Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in nulliparous women at the United States Military Academy.

Authors:  Wilma I Larsen; Trudy A Yavorek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-08-03

10.  The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population.

Authors:  Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove; Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Curt W Burger; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.