Literature DB >> 12114893

Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved?

Kathie L Hullfish1, Viktor E Bovbjerg, Jennifer Gibson, William D Steers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe patient-identified goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgical procedures and patient-reported achievement of those goals. STUDY
DESIGN: Thirty-three consecutive patients scheduled for pelvic floor dysfunction surgical procedures completed a preoperative questionnaire on which they listed up to 5 personal goals for surgical outcomes. At 6- and 12-week follow-up, patients reported the degree (rated 1-5) to which each goal had been met (1 = strongly disagree that the goal was met; 5 = strongly agree). Age, race, vaginal parity, previous pelvic surgical procedures, pelvic floor dysfunction diagnosis, pelvic floor dysfunction surgical procedure, and perioperative complications were also recorded. Goals were categorized as being primarily related to symptom relief, increasing activity, general or other health concerns, social relationships and self-image, or physical appearance. Rates of self-reported goal achievement at 6 and 12 weeks were calculated, and differences in the proportion of goals achieved by category were assessed.
RESULTS: Women reported a mean of 3.6 goals; 24 of 33 women (72.7%) listed > or = 4 goals. Of the 119 goals listed, 51 goals (42.9%) dealt with urinary or bowel symptoms; 36 goals (30.3%) dealt with improving activity; 15 goals (12.6%) dealt with general health concerns; 14 goals (11.8%) dealt with social relationships and self-image, and 3 goals (2.5%) dealt with physical appearance. Twenty-seven of the 33 women (81.8%) listed symptom relief; 22 women (66.7%) listed at least 1 activity-related goal; 14 women (42.4%) listed general or longer term health, and 11 women (33.3%) listed a social or self-image goal. Of the 119 goals listed, women agreed or strongly agreed that 88 goals (73.9%) were met at 6 weeks, and 101 goals (84.9%) were met at 12 weeks (chi(2) = 3.7 for difference between proportion at 6 and 12 weeks; P =.054). At 6 weeks, women agreed or strongly agreed that most goals had been met for activity, symptoms, general health, and appearance, but not for social/self-image goals (chi(2) = 24.9; P <.001). However, by 12 weeks, women agreed or strongly agreed that most goals had been met in all categories.
CONCLUSION: Women who undergo pelvic floor dysfunction surgical procedures have a variety of desired subjective outcomes. Goals that relate to social roles, sexuality, and self-image may take longer to successfully achieve than other types of goals. Longer-term follow-up is crucial to determine whether initial improvements have been maintained. Assessment of patient goals is quick and easy and may help clinicians better understand and care for their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12114893     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  36 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of patient selected goals as an outcome measure in overactive bladder.

Authors:  Rufus Cartwright; Sushma Srikrishna; Linda Cardozo; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Robert Freeman; Matthew Barber; Christopher Maher; Bernard Haylen; Stavros Athanasiou; Steven Swift; Kristene Whitmore; Gamal Ghoniem; Dirk de Ridder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Kim Kenton; Nancy K Janz; Yvonne Hsu; Keisha Y Dyer; W Jerod Greer; Amanda White; Susie Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Physical activity in women planning sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Vicki Handa; Linda Brubaker; Diane Borello-France; John Wei; Ellen Wells; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-05-11

Review 5.  What's a 'cure'? Patient-centred outcomes of treatments for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  R M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-09-12

6.  Pathophysiology of sexual dysfunction as related to pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Lone Mouritsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05

Review 7.  Repair of pelvic organ prolapse: what is the goal?

Authors:  Margarita M Aponte; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery?

Authors:  Anna L Pilzek; Christina A Raker; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance?

Authors:  Yuko M Komesu; Rebecca G Rogers; Martha A Rode; Ellen C Craig; Ronald M Schrader; Katey A Gallegos; Biatris Villareal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.