Literature DB >> 12114097

Mitral inflow and mitral annular motion velocities in patients with mitral annular calcification: evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and pulsed Doppler tissue imaging.

T Soeki1, N Fukuda, H Shinohara, K Sakabe, Y Onose, Y Sawada, Y Tamura.   

Abstract

AIMS: We evaluated the relationship between the mitral inflow velocities by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and mitral annular motion velocities by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging in patients with mitral annular calcification. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with mitral annular calcification were divided into two groups: severe mitral annular calcification (n=15, mitral annular calcification bigger than or equal 5mm in width) and mild mitral annular calcification (n=38, mitral annular calcification <5mm in width). In addition, 20 patients with hypertensive heart disease (HHD group) and mild left ventricular hypertrophy but no mitral annular calcification and 30 normal individuals (normal group) were studied. The early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) was higher in the severe mitral annular calcification group (0.75+/-0.26 m/s) than in the HHD and normal groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 0.65+/-0.21; HHD, 0.57+/-0.24; normal, 0.55+/-0.15m/s), and the late diastolic mitral inflow velocity (A) was higher in the severe mitral annular calcification group (1.24+/-0.23 m/s) than in the other three groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 0.96+/-0.20; HHD, 0.84+/-0.23; normal, 0.75+/-0.13 m/s). In contrast, the early and late diastolic annular velocities (Ea, Aa) were lower in the severe mitral annular calcification group (Ea: 5.7+/-2.2; Aa: 11.9+/-4.4 cm/s) than in the other three groups (Ea: mild mitral annular calcification, 8.3+/-2.5; HHD, 7.7+/-2.2; normal, 9.0+/-1.8 cm/s; Aa: mild mitral annular calcification, 14.2+/-4.1; HHD, 14.3+/-2.8; normal, 14.2+/-2.1cm/s). Mitral valve area was smaller in the severe mitral annular calcification group (2.6+/-1.0 cm(2)) than in the other three groups (mild mitral annular calcification, 3.1+/-0.7; HHD, 4.1+/-0.7; normal, 4.2+/-0.9 cm(2)). In the mitral annular calcification and normal groups, the A correlated inversely with mitral valve area (r=-0.67, P<0.01) and directly with severity of mitral annular calcification (r=0.65, P<0.01), and the Ea correlated inversely with left ventricular wall thickness (r=-0.37, P<0.01) and severity of mitral annular calcification (r=-0.45, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Patients with severe mitral annular calcification have higher mitral inflow velocities due to mitral annular restriction and lower mitral annular velocities caused by decreased mitral annular motion and abnormal left ventricular relaxation. Copyright 2002 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12114097     DOI: 10.1053/euje.2001.0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1532-2114


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic implications of left atrial dilation evaluated by echocardiographic volume in patients with normal left atrial antero-posterior dimensions.

Authors:  Atsuko Muranaka; Satoshi Yuda; Maki Ichimura; Takahiro Doi; Hitomi Yamamoto; Hidemichi Kouzu; Naofumi Kaneko; Sakiko Fujii; Noriyuki Fujii; Shinya Shimoshige; Akiyoshi Hashimoto; Tomoaki Nakata; Kazufumi Tsuchihashi; Tetsuji Miura; Naoki Watanabe; Kazuaki Shimamoto
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-08-22

2.  Prognostic value of pulmonary congestion assessed by lung ultrasound imaging during heart failure hospitalisation: A two-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Stefano Coiro; Guillaume Porot; Patrick Rossignol; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Erberto Carluccio; Isabella Tritto; Olivier Huttin; Simon Lemoine; Nicolas Sadoul; Erwan Donal; Faiez Zannad; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Forgotten Variable of Shear Stress in Mitral Annular Calcification: Whole Blood Viscosity.

Authors:  Elif Hande Ozcan Cetin; Mehmet Serkan Cetin; Ugur Canpolat; Erol Kalender; Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras; Sinan Aydogdu
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Impact of left ventricular diastolic function and survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Kimi Sato; Serge Harb; Arnav Kumar; Samir R Kapadia; Stephanie Mick; Amar Krishnaswamy; Milind Y Desai; Brian P Griffin; L Leonardo Rodriguez; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Zoran B Popović
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With a Balloon-Expandable Valve.

Authors:  Haruka Kameshima; Masaki Izumo; Tomomi Suzuki; Hiroshi Ohara; Yukio Sato; Mika Watanabe; Shingo Kuwata; Kazuaki Okuyama; Ryo Kamijima; Manabu Takai; Seisyou Kou; Yasuhiro Tanabe; Tomoo Harada; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Author`s Reply.

Authors:  Adil Bayramoğlu; Hakan Taşolar; Yılmaz Ömür Otlu
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function after Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis patients by echocardiographic according to different guidelines.

Authors:  Yao Guo; Minmin Sun; Haiyan Chen; Dehong Kong; Xianhong Shu; Cuizhen Pan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.