Literature DB >> 12113782

Distinction between supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis tendon tears with ultrasound in 332 surgically confirmed cases.

Harald Zehetgruber1, Thomas Lang, Christian Wurnig.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography for the characterisation of size and location of the involved tendons. in 332 consecutive patients who underwent surgery, all preoperative ultrasonographic reports were reviewed and ultrasound (US) and surgical findings were compared. Ultrasound criteria for cuff tears were complete nonvisualisation of the cuff tendons or localised absence and focal discontinuity. In all but 12 cases, US diagnoses corresponded with intraoperative findings (sensitivity 98%, confidence interval 95.1-99.3; specificity 93%, CI 85.7-97.1; accuracy 97%, CI 93.8-98.1). Size and location of the tear were correctly predicted in 69 of 96 cases (accuracy 87%, sensitivity 89%, specificity 87%). US demonstrated less extensive tears than observed at surgery in 18%. Ultrasonography was highly accurate and sensitive for detecting rotator cuff tears, but seems to be a method of limited value for evaluation of the size of cuff tears, in particular, for the detection of small tears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12113782     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00508-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  Prevalence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis.

Authors:  R Narasimhan; K Shamse; C Nash; D Dhingra; S Kennedy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Ultrasound vs. MRI in the assessment of rotator cuff structure prior to shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Alexander Fischer; Marc-André Weber; Clément Neubecker; Thomas Bruckner; Michael Tanner; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 3.  Literature Review of Subscapularis Tear, Associated injuries, and the Available Treatment Options.

Authors:  Daniel B Goldberg; Trent M Tamate; Morgan Hasegawa; Thomas J K Kane; Jae S You; Scott N Crawford
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

5.  Ultrasonographic findings of the shoulder in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comparison with physical examination.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Kim; Su Ho Kim; Young Il Seo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Comparative Analysis of Real-Time Dynamic Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tear Injury.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Xingang Gu; Lei Zhao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered.

Authors:  Mário Lenza; Rachelle Buchbinder; Yemisi Takwoingi; Renea V Johnston; Nigel Ca Hanchard; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.