UNLABELLED: At a population-based screening of 5-6-y-old children, 37 children were identified as having definite or borderline motor difficulties consistent with developmental coordination disorder. When 7-8 y old they were re-examined to determine their current motor status and to compare it with that at the age of 5-6 y. The motor status was investigated from three perspectives: by a motor test, by the use of a self-perceived motor competence scale, and from the parents' descriptions. On a group level the children had not changed their motor status when 7-8 y old, according to the total scores in the Movement ABC motor test and the Perceived Motor Competence scale. On an individual level most children with definite motor difficulties remained in their category regarding motor difficulties at the follow-up, while most children with borderline motor difficulties did not. The parents' descriptions indicated an association between willingness to engage in physical activities and degree of motor difficulties. CONCLUSION: Over a period of 1.5 y most children with definite motor difficulties continued to have such difficulties. The parents' descriptions of their children's motor status and development were in agreement with the children's motor status as measured by a motor test, but were not in total accordance with the children's self-perceived competence.
UNLABELLED: At a population-based screening of 5-6-y-old children, 37 children were identified as having definite or borderline motor difficulties consistent with developmental coordination disorder. When 7-8 y old they were re-examined to determine their current motor status and to compare it with that at the age of 5-6 y. The motor status was investigated from three perspectives: by a motor test, by the use of a self-perceived motor competence scale, and from the parents' descriptions. On a group level the children had not changed their motor status when 7-8 y old, according to the total scores in the Movement ABC motor test and the Perceived Motor Competence scale. On an individual level most children with definite motor difficulties remained in their category regarding motor difficulties at the follow-up, while most children with borderline motor difficulties did not. The parents' descriptions indicated an association between willingness to engage in physical activities and degree of motor difficulties. CONCLUSION: Over a period of 1.5 y most children with definite motor difficulties continued to have such difficulties. The parents' descriptions of their children's motor status and development were in agreement with the children's motor status as measured by a motor test, but were not in total accordance with the children's self-perceived competence.
Authors: Rainer Blank; Anna L Barnett; John Cairney; Dido Green; Amanda Kirby; Helene Polatajko; Sara Rosenblum; Bouwien Smits-Engelsman; David Sugden; Peter Wilson; Sabine Vinçon Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Francesca Valente; Chiara Pesola; Valentina Baglioni; Maria Teresa Giannini; Flavia Chiarotti; Barbara Caravale; Francesco Cardona Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jocelyn L K Tan; Anna-Mari Ylä-Kojola; Johan G Eriksson; Minna K Salonen; Niko Wasenius; Nicolas H Hart; Paola Chivers; Timo Rantalainen; Aulikki Lano; Harri Piitulainen Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.645
Authors: John Cairney; Scott Veldhuizen; M Christine Rodriguez; Sara King-Dowling; Matthew Y Kwan; Terrance Wade; David Price; Cheryl Missiuna; Brian Timmons Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-08 Impact factor: 2.692