Literature DB >> 12112768

Spatial independent component analysis of functional MRI time-series: to what extent do results depend on the algorithm used?

Fabrizio Esposito1, Elia Formisano, Erich Seifritz, Rainer Goebel, Renato Morrone, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Francesco Di Salle.   

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) has been successfully employed to decompose functional MRI (fMRI) time-series into sets of activation maps and associated time-courses. Several ICA algorithms have been proposed in the neural network literature. Applied to fMRI, these algorithms might lead to different spatial or temporal readouts of brain activation. We compared the two ICA algorithms that have been used so far for spatial ICA (sICA) of fMRI time-series: the Infomax (Bell and Sejnowski [1995]: Neural Comput 7:1004-1034) and the Fixed-Point (Hyvärinen [1999]: Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst 10:273-279) algorithms. We evaluated the Infomax- and Fixed Point-based sICA decompositions of simulated motor, and real motor and visual activation fMRI time-series using an ensemble of measures. Log-likelihood (McKeown et al. [1998]: Hum Brain Mapp 6:160-188) was used as a measure of how significantly the estimated independent sources fit the statistical structure of the data; receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and linear correlation analyses were used to evaluate the algorithms' accuracy of estimating the spatial layout and the temporal dynamics of simulated and real activations; cluster sizing calculations and an estimation of a residual gaussian noise term within the components were used to examine the anatomic structure of ICA components and for the assessment of noise reduction capabilities. Whereas both algorithms produced highly accurate results, the Fixed-Point outperformed the Infomax in terms of spatial and temporal accuracy as long as inferential statistics were employed as benchmarks. Conversely, the Infomax sICA was superior in terms of global estimation of the ICA model and noise reduction capabilities. Because of its adaptive nature, the Infomax approach appears to be better suited to investigate activation phenomena that are not predictable or adequately modelled by inferential techniques. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12112768      PMCID: PMC6871848          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  19 in total

1.  An experimental comparison of neural algorithms for independent component analysis and blind separation.

Authors:  X Giannakopoulos; J Karhunen; E Oja
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.866

2.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms.

Authors:  V D Calhoun; T Adali; G D Pearlson; J J Pekar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis.

Authors:  R Baumgartner; L Ryner; W Richter; R Summers; M Jarmasz; R Somorjai
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis.

Authors:  B B Biswal; J L Ulmer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  A multistep unsupervised fuzzy clustering analysis of fMRI time series.

Authors:  M J Fadili; S Ruan; D Bloyet; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions.

Authors:  M J McKeown; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Mixture model mapping of the brain activation in functional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  B S Everitt; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Modes or models: a critique on independent component analysis for fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  33 in total

1.  Changes in effective connectivity models in the presence of task-correlated motion: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Maria Gavrilescu; Geoffrey W Stuart; Anthony Waites; Graeme Jackson; Imants D Svalbe; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest.

Authors:  Vincent G van de Ven; Elia Formisano; David Prvulovic; Christian H Roeder; David E J Linden
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Group ICA of resting-state data: a comparison.

Authors:  Veronika Schöpf; Christian Windischberger; Christian H Kasess; Rupert Lanzenberger; Ewald Moser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  A new method for detecting causality in fMRI data of cognitive processing.

Authors:  Alessandro Londei; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Demis Basso; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-10-27

5.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  The chronoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Andreas Bartels; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Partner-matching for the automated identification of reproducible ICA components from fMRI datasets: algorithm and validation.

Authors:  Zhishun Wang; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional connectivity estimation in fMRI data: influence of preprocessing and time course selection.

Authors:  Maria Gavrilescu; Geoffrey W Stuart; Susan Rossell; Katherine Henshall; Colette McKay; Alex A Sergejew; David Copolov; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Ranking and averaging independent component analysis by reproducibility (RAICAR).

Authors:  Zhi Yang; Stephen LaConte; Xuchu Weng; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Large-scale neural model validation of partial correlation analysis for effective connectivity investigation in functional MRI.

Authors:  G Marrelec; J Kim; J Doyon; B Horwitz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.