BACKGROUND: Prognostic indicators that could assist in a more precise selection of patients with small oral carcinomas for differentiated therapy would be valuable. A significant fraction of patients with stage I disease have a relatively poor prognosis despite the small size of the tumor, but in general stage I tumors of the oral cavity have a favorable prognosis. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with stage I (T1N0M0) oral squamous cell carcinoma from two different ENT departments were included in the study. The pretreatment biopsy specimens were graded according to the modified classification of Jakobsson et al. Eight individual parameters were recorded, four parameters describing the tumor cell population and four parameters describing the tumor/host interaction. RESULTS: The only significant prognostic parameter for disease-specific survival was "mode of invasion." The histologic mean score was not significantly correlated to disease-specific or crude survival. CONCLUSIONS: Mode of invasion is the most important histologic parameter when evaluating the prognosis. Histologic evaluation of small squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity may assist the design of a differentiated treatment strategy (eg, monotherapy vs combined treatment). Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 24: 656-660, 2002
BACKGROUND: Prognostic indicators that could assist in a more precise selection of patients with small oral carcinomas for differentiated therapy would be valuable. A significant fraction of patients with stage I disease have a relatively poor prognosis despite the small size of the tumor, but in general stage I tumors of the oral cavity have a favorable prognosis. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with stage I (T1N0M0) oral squamous cell carcinoma from two different ENT departments were included in the study. The pretreatment biopsy specimens were graded according to the modified classification of Jakobsson et al. Eight individual parameters were recorded, four parameters describing the tumor cell population and four parameters describing the tumor/host interaction. RESULTS: The only significant prognostic parameter for disease-specific survival was "mode of invasion." The histologic mean score was not significantly correlated to disease-specific or crude survival. CONCLUSIONS: Mode of invasion is the most important histologic parameter when evaluating the prognosis. Histologic evaluation of small squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity may assist the design of a differentiated treatment strategy (eg, monotherapy vs combined treatment). Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 24: 656-660, 2002
Authors: Yufeng Li; Shuting Bai; William Carroll; Dan Dayan; Joseph C Dort; Keith Heller; George Jour; Harold Lau; Carla Penner; Michael Prystowsky; Eben Rosenthal; Nicolas F Schlecht; Richard V Smith; Mark Urken; Marilena Vered; Beverly Wang; Bruce Wenig; Abdissa Negassa; Margaret Brandwein-Gensler Journal: Head Neck Pathol Date: 2012-12-19
Authors: Bin Xu; Abeer M Salama; Cristina Valero; Avery Yuan; Anjanie Khimraj; Maelle Saliba; Daniella K Zanoni; Ian Ganly; Ronald Ghossein; Snehal G Patel; Nora Katabi Journal: Pathol Res Pract Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 3.309