Literature DB >> 12111883

Bayesian two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Say-Beng Tan1, David Machin.   

Abstract

Many different statistical designs have been used in phase II clinical trials. The majority of these are based on frequentist statistical approaches. Bayesian methods provide a good alternative to frequentist approaches as they allow for the incorporation of relevant prior information and the presentation of the trial results in a manner which, some feel, is more intuitive and helpful. In this paper, we propose two new Bayesian designs for phase II clinical trials. These designs have been developed specifically to make them as user friendly and as familiar as possible to those who have had experience working with two-stage frequentist phase II designs. Thus, unlike many of the Bayesian designs already proposed in the literature, our designs do not require a distribution for the response rate of the currently used drug or the explicit specification of utility or loss functions. We study the properties of our designs and compare them with the Simon two-stage optimal and minimax designs. We also apply them to an example of two recently concluded phase II trials conducted at the National Cancer Centre in Singapore. Sample size tables for the designs are given. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111883     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  J Jack Lee; Diane D Liu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Simulation optimization for Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial with binary endpoints.

Authors:  Zhenning Yu; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Caitlyn Meinzer
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Bayesian design for two-arm randomized Phase II clinical trials with endpoints from the exponential family using multiple constraints.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Jo A Wick; Jianghua He; Jonathan D Mahnken; Matthew S Mayo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Advances in Statistical Approaches Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Gary L Rosner; Olga Marchenko; Tom Parke; Inna Perevozskaya; Yanping Wang
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Suyu Liu; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Using short-term response information to facilitate adaptive randomization for survival clinical trials.

Authors:  Xuelin Huang; Jing Ning; Yisheng Li; Elihu Estey; Jean-Pierre Issa; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The utility of Bayesian predictive probabilities for interim monitoring of clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin R Saville; Jason T Connor; Gregory D Ayers; JoAnn Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  A Bayesian hierarchical monitoring design for phase II cancer clinical trials: Incorporating information on response duration into monitoring rules.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Junsheng Ma; Chunyan Cai; Naval Daver; Jing Ning
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  The use of local and nonlocal priors in Bayesian test-based monitoring for single-arm phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhou; Ruitao Lin; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.234

10.  A Bayesian re-assessment of two Phase II trials of gemcitabine in metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  S-B Tan; D Machin; B-C Tai; K-F Foo; E-H Tan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.